Unveiling the Power of Carbon Fiber Filament

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. Comparison of AMS Tubes
3. Print Quality Evaluation
4. Test on Rigidity
5. Weighing the Frames
6. Conclusion
7. Voting for Drone Frame

Article

Introduction

Welcome back to the Channel! In today's video, we will be reviewing all of the carbon fiber filaments from the carbon fiber printing filament series. Specifically, we will be focusing on the drone frames that have been printed using these filaments. Before diving into the frames, we will first take a look at the AMS tubes used in one slot. Additionally, we will compare a few other tubes to see if there are any noticeable differences or unnecessary wear and tear. So, let's dive right in!

Comparison of AMS Tubes

Let's start by examining the difference between the AMS tube used in the printing process and another tube. Upon visual inspection, there seems to be no noticeable wear or tear on either tube. This is good news, especially if You only need to run a few prints through the AMS. However, if you were to run hundreds of prints, there might be some variation. Overall, Based on my limited testing, the tubes appear to be in good condition.

Print Quality Evaluation

Moving on, let's evaluate the print quality of the drone frames using different carbon fiber filaments. We will begin with PETG filament. As you may recall, this filament has a shiny finish. The overall print quality is quite good, with only a few minor gaps. Adjusting the slicer settings or using a 0.4 nozzle size might help further enhance the print quality.

On to the PLA filament. Similarly, the print turned out quite well, but there are still some noticeable gaps. These gaps were included in the pre-made slicer settings provided by the RFID. Again, tweaking the slicer settings or switching to a 0.4 nozzle size could potentially reduce these gaps.

Next up, let's examine the PAHT filament. Initially, the print quality looked great. However, after sitting for a few days, I noticed that the frame became warped. This may have been caused by certain factors during the printing process. Despite the warping, the print quality remains good, with no obvious gaps or errors.

Finally, let's assess the PET filament. The print quality is excellent, with a flat and smooth finish. Even the holes and gaps on the frame appear smooth to the touch. Compared to the other filaments, the PET filament produced the best print quality.

Test on Rigidity

Moving on to the rigidity test, we will assess the stiffness of each drone frame. Starting with the PETG-CF frame, it exhibits a fair amount of rigidity. There are minor gaps in the print quality, but this does not significantly affect the overall stiffness. The prop guard, although slightly flimsy, may provide some impact resistance.

The PLA frame, on the other HAND, is noticeably stiffer than the PETG frame. Despite the visible gaps, the frame holds its Shape well and offers increased rigidity. However, the prop guard still exhibits some flexibility.

As for the PAHT-CF frame, it is not as rigid as PLA. Additionally, this particular frame displayed noticeable warping on one side. It is unclear whether this issue was caused by a printing error or other factors. The smooth surface on the bottom of the frame is a positive aspect, but it lacks the stiffness of PLA.

Finally, the PET frame showcases exceptional rigidity, rivaling that of PLA. The smooth surface and absence of gaps contribute to its stiffness. In terms of rigidity, PET and PLA are the top contenders, with PET slightly edging out PLA.

Weighing the Frames

Let's now focus on the weight of each frame. After weighing the frames individually, here are the results:

• PETG Frame: 9 grams
• PLA Frame: 9 grams
• PAHT Frame: 8 grams
• PET Frame: 9.5-10 grams

It's worth noting that the PET frame weighs slightly more than the others, while the rest range from 8 grams to 9 grams. The weight variances are relatively minimal.

Conclusion

To conclude the carbon fiber filament printing series, I'd like to express my gratitude for the support and feedback. It has been a fun and exciting Journey, exploring the possibilities of different filament materials. Based on the print quality, rigidity, and weight, the PET filament stands out as the top performer. However, the PLA filament offers a close competition in terms of rigidity.

Voting for Drone Frame

Finally, I would like to invite you all to participate in a survey on my Community page. I have created a poll where you can vote for which filament you believe should be used to print a drone frame. Once we receive enough votes, I will proceed with printing the winning filament and create a video showcasing the results. Your engagement is greatly appreciated!

Thank you for joining me on this carbon fiber filament printing series, and I hope you have a fantastic week!

Highlights

• Comparison of AMS tubes revealed no noticeable wear or tear, indicating their durability.
• PETG filament demonstrated shiny finish and overall good print quality, with minor gaps.
• PLA filament showcased good print quality, but visible gaps were present. Adjusting slicer settings could potentially minimize these gaps.
• PAHT filament initially had excellent print quality, but it showed signs of warping after sitting for a few days.
• PET filament exhibited outstanding print quality, with a flat and smooth finish, making it the top performer among the carbon fiber filaments.
• Rigidity test results showed PLA and PET filaments to be the stiffest, with PET slightly surpassing PLA.
• Weighing the frames revealed minimal weight variations, with PET weighing slightly more than the others.
• Overall, PET filament emerged as the front runner in terms of print quality and rigidity.
• Audience participation is encouraged through voting for the filament to be used in printing a drone frame.

FAQ

Q: Can the gaps in the print quality be eliminated completely? A: While it is challenging to completely eliminate gaps, adjusting slicer settings and nozzle size can help reduce them significantly.

Q: Do the warping issues with PAHT filament affect its overall performance? A: Although the warping may impact the frame's flatness, the print quality remains intact, making it suitable for use in certain applications.

Q: Which filament offers the best combination of rigidity and lightweight design? A: PET and PLA filaments both offer excellent rigidity while maintaining a relatively lightweight design. The final choice may depend on specific project requirements.

Q: Are the differences in weight among the frames significant? A: The weight variations are minimal and may not have a significant impact on the overall performance of the drone frame.