AMD FM2+平台仍能遊玩遊戲嗎？

AMD FM2+平台仍能遊玩遊戲嗎？

Highlights:

• AMD fm2 plus platform was not a powerful gaming platform in 2015 and performs poorly in 2023 compared to modern systems.
• The fm2 plus CPU struggles to run games like Fortnite, GTA 5, Cyberpunk 2077, and God of War, with significant performance loss compared to a modern i5 processor.
• Rainbow Six Siege is the only Game where the fm2 plus CPU provides playable performance, but it still falls behind the i5.
• The fm2 plus platform is not recommended for gaming in 2023, and it is better to opt for Intel Haswell systems instead.

Table of Contents:

1. Introduction 😦
2. Hardware Setup 😃
3. Performance in Fortnite 😞
4. Performance in GTA 5 😞
5. Performance in Cyberpunk 2077 😞
6. Performance in Counter-Strike 2 😞
7. Performance in God of War 😞
8. Performance in Rainbow Six Siege 😃
9. Overall Gaming Performance Comparison 😞
10. Conclusion and Recommendations 😃

Introduction Back in 2015, if you were considering building a budget gaming PC, the AMD fm2 plus platform may have been on your radar. However, while it offered cost savings, its gaming performance left much to be desired. Fast forward to 2023, and we are now evaluating how this outdated system holds up in today's gaming landscape. In this article, we will be benchmarking the fm2 plus system's performance to determine if it can still deliver enjoyable gaming experiences. But before we delve into the results, it is crucial to note that under no circumstances do we recommend purchasing an fm2 plus system for gaming in 2023, as more powerful Intel Haswell systems can be found for similar prices.

Hardware Setup Let's first take a look at the hardware setup we used for our benchmarking. The heart of the system is the AMD 88 7650k, a quad-core CPU that can be considered an APU due to its integrated R7 Radeon graphics. While it may have been considered basic in 2015, it falls far behind modern standards in 2023. The motherboard model we used was a no-frills Gigabyte Ultra Durable, a budget option common among fm2 motherboards. The most expensive component in this system is the 16 GB of DDR3 memory, running in dual channel configuration, which at least offers some level of performance. For testing, we paired the system with an RX Vega 56 GPU, which should enable the fm2 plus CPU to reach its maximum potential.

Performance in Fortnite We started our benchmarking with Fortnite, adopting the performance API and setting all other graphics options to low to give the fm2 plus APU a chance to shine. However, the results were underwhelming, with an average frame rate of only 70 FPS and an abysmal 1% low of 9 FPS. Comparing this to a modern i5, the performance difference was staggering, with the i5 12400 F achieving an average frame rate of 249 FPS, an increase of 256%. The 1% low also saw a significant improvement, increasing by 80 FPS to reach 89 FPS. It is clear that the fm2 plus CPU is unable to deliver satisfactory performance in Fortnite.

Performance in GTA 5 Next, we tested the fm2 plus system's performance in GTA 5, setting it to the high preset with 2x MSAA and adjusting population density and distance sliders to mitigate the CPU's limitations. Unfortunately, the results were again disappointing, with an average frame rate of 34 FPS and a 1% low of 25 FPS. Considering that GTA 5 was released in the same year as the fm2 plus CPU, these numbers are far from impressive. In contrast, the i5 12400 F achieved an average frame rate of 145 FPS, representing a considerable 320% performance increase. The 1% low also saw a significant improvement, reaching 118 FPS. It is evident that the fm2 plus CPU falls short in providing an optimal gaming experience in GTA 5.

Performance in Cyberpunk 2077 Moving on to the demanding title of Cyberpunk 2077, we set the graphics options to the low preset with high textures to ensure the 8 GB of VRAM on the Vega 56 GPU could handle the game. However, the fm2 plus CPU struggled to keep up, resulting in an average frame rate of a mere 27 FPS and a 1% low of 15 FPS. This is far from a playable experience. In contrast, the i5 12400 F paired with the Vega 56 GPU delivered much better performance, achieving an average frame rate of 57 FPS and a 1% low of 43 FPS. This significant difference in performance highlights the fm2 plus CPU's limitations in handling modern, demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077.

Performance in Counter-Strike 2 Counter-Strike 2 is known for being a CPU-bound title, making it an interesting benchmark for the fm2 plus CPU. We set the game to the low preset and disabled FSR to ensure accurate comparisons. However, the fm2 plus APU struggled to provide a smooth gaming experience, with an average frame rate of 36 FPS and a 1% low of 23 FPS. Considering that competitive shooters like Counter-Strike 2 thrive on higher frame rates, these numbers fall short of what is considered playable. Switching to a modern i5 processor, we observed a significant performance improvement, with an average frame rate of 199 FPS and a 1% low of 88 FPS. This further emphasizes the fm2 plus CPU's limitations in delivering satisfactory gaming performance.

Performance in God of War God of War proved to be another CPU-intensive game, and the fm2 plus CPU struggled to run it smoothly. Setting the game to the high preset, the fm2 plus APU achieved an average frame rate of 37 FPS and a 1% low of 20 FPS. While playable, it falls short of delivering a great gaming experience. In comparison, the i5 12400 F achieved an average frame rate of 83 FPS and a 1% low of 72 FPS, providing a smoother gameplay experience. The fm2 plus CPU's lackluster performance in God of War further reinforces the need to consider more capable gaming platforms.

Performance in Rainbow Six Siege Among the games tested, Rainbow Six Siege provided the best performance on the fm2 plus system. With the graphics set to the medium preset, the fm2 plus CPU achieved an average frame rate of 96 FPS and a 1% low of 57 FPS. While playable, this remains modest performance. In contrast, the i5 12400 F delivered significantly better results, with an average frame rate of 285 FPS and a 1% low of 198 FPS. The disparity in performance showcases the fm2 plus CPU's limitations in fully utilizing its paired Vega 56 GPU. Although Rainbow Six Siege is playable on the fm2 plus platform, the substantial performance loss compared to a modern processor should not be overlooked.

Overall Gaming Performance Comparison After carefully evaluating the results from all the benchmarked games, it is evident that the fm2 plus CPU is not a viable gaming platform in 2023, especially when compared to modern alternatives. While Rainbow Six Siege offered playable performance, all other tested games struggled to run smoothly on the fm2 plus system. The performance gap between the fm2 plus CPU and a modern i5 processor was significant in every title, underscoring the need to opt for more capable platforms.

Conclusion and Recommendations In conclusion, it is clear that the fm2 plus platform, specifically the 7650k CPU, is not suitable for gaming in 2023. Its lackluster compute power and outdated architecture severely limit its ability to deliver satisfactory gaming experiences. For those looking to build a budget gaming PC in 2023, we highly recommend considering Intel Haswell systems instead. Haswell CPUs offer superior performance and can be found at similar price points. Avoid the fm2 plus platform unless you stumble upon it for free or at an exceptionally low price. Don't settle for subpar performance when better options are available.

FAQ:

Q: Can I still play games on an fm2 plus system in 2023? A: While technically possible, the fm2 plus platform, particularly the 7650k CPU, struggles to provide satisfactory gaming performance in most modern titles. We recommend exploring more capable platforms, such as Intel Haswell systems, for an enjoyable gaming experience.

Q: Are there any advantages to choosing an fm2 plus system over modern alternatives? A: In terms of gaming performance, modern alternatives, such as Intel Haswell systems, offer superior capabilities. The fm2 plus platform lacks the compute power and architectural advancements necessary to handle demanding games effectively.

Q: Is the fm2 plus platform suitable for competitive gaming? A: No, the fm2 plus platform's limited performance makes it unsuitable for competitive gaming, where high frame rates and smooth gameplay are essential. Opting for a more capable gaming platform, such as Intel Haswell systems, is recommended for competitive gaming.

Q: How does the performance of an fm2 plus system compare to a modern i5 processor? A: The fm2 plus system, particularly the 7650k CPU, falls significantly behind a modern i5 processor in terms of gaming performance. Across various benchmarked games, the fm2 plus CPU consistently lags behind, resulting in noticeable performance differences.

Q: Can I upgrade an fm2 plus system to improve its gaming performance? A: Unfortunately, the fm2 plus platform's limited scalability and outdated architecture make significant upgrades challenging. It is more practical to invest in a newer gaming platform that offers better performance and upgrade options.

Resources:

• YouTube Channel of the Tech Mentioned in the article: [link]
• Video on testing an 8-core Xeon on the Haswell architecture: [link]