Controversy: Faking Race to Gain College Admission

Controversy: Faking Race to Gain College Admission

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. The Harvard Admissions Controversy
  3. The Role of Race in College Admissions
  4. The Experience of an Indian-American Applicant
  5. The Pocahontas Factor
  6. Trump and Affirmative Action
  7. The Asian-American Quota Debate
  8. The Problem with Affirmative Action
  9. Alternatives to Affirmative Action
  10. Conclusion

The Role of Race in College Admissions

The issue of race in college admissions has been a controversial topic for many years. While some argue that race should play a role in the admissions process to ensure diversity, others believe that it is unfair to use race as a factor in determining who gets accepted into college. The recent news that the majority of students accepted into Harvard University's incoming freshman class identify as nonwhite has brought this issue back into the spotlight.

The Harvard Admissions Controversy

The news that the Department of Justice is investigating allegations that Harvard is denying places to qualified Asian-American students has only added fuel to the fire. The head of admissions consultant at Interview S.O.S., an Indian American, has a unique experience with this topic. He realized that the only way he would be accepted into med school would be to pass as black. He chronicled his experience in his book "Almost Black: The True Story of How I Got into Medical School by Pretending to be Black."

The Experience of an Indian-American Applicant

The admissions consultant at Interview S.O.S. shaved his head, trimmed his eyelashes, and joined the organization of black students so he could Apply to the medical school as a black man. He also used his middle name Jojo. He subsequently interviewed at schools across the country and managed to get wait-listed at the University of Washington and University of Pennsylvania, then ranked the third and fourth best medical schools in the country, and got into St. Louis School of Medicine despite the fact that his pitiful 3.1 GPA was dramatically lower than their average of 3.7.

The Pocahontas Factor

The admissions consultant at Interview S.O.S. believes that the majority of Harvard being nonwhite is deceptive because of the Pocahontas factor. There are people whiter than winter in Alaska who call themselves a minority because they know it can improve their chance of admissions. Self-reporting on minority, he doesn't think that's necessarily the best data to use.

Trump and Affirmative Action

The admissions consultant at Interview S.O.S. believes that President Trump, by appointing conservative anti-affirmative action justices and by using the Justice Department to go after the colleges and universities, will end affirmative action like Lincoln ended slavery. As You know, Bob Jones University, many years ago, lost its nonprofit status because of its racist policies. Similarly, when it comes to the issue of affirmative action, the colleges and universities have pleaded guilty as charged. They publicly endorsed racial discrimination in the form of affirmative action in the Fisher case. Therefore, the Trump Justice Department could use, with the Supreme Court, could effectively force the universities to end their racist affirmative action policies by forcing them to lose their federal funding.

The Asian-American Quota Debate

The admissions consultant at Interview S.O.S. believes that as an Asian-American, it is harder to get into college or graduate school than any other racial category. In every place where the data is available, it is consistently harder for an Asian-American to get in. Statistical data, there's no action for racism. Affirmative action is a systemized racism. It's a racial classification system that changes people's chance of admission to college or graduate school. And there's no justification for race racism.

The Problem with Affirmative Action

The admissions consultant at Interview S.O.S. believes that affirmative action is a problem because it is a form of reverse discrimination. It gives preferential treatment to certain groups Based on their race or ethnicity, which is unfair to those who are not part of those groups. It also creates a stigma around those who are admitted through affirmative action, as they are often seen as less qualified than their peers.

Alternatives to Affirmative Action

The admissions consultant at Interview S.O.S. believes that there are alternatives to affirmative action that can achieve the same goal of diversity without discriminating against certain groups. One such alternative is socioeconomic affirmative action, which takes into account a student's socioeconomic background rather than their race or ethnicity. Another alternative is to focus on improving K-12 education in underprivileged areas, which would help to level the playing field for all students.

Conclusion

The issue of race in college admissions is a complex and controversial one. While some argue that race should play a role in the admissions process to ensure diversity, others believe that it is unfair to use race as a factor in determining who gets accepted into college. The recent news that the majority of students accepted into Harvard University's incoming freshman class identify as nonwhite has brought this issue back into the spotlight. The admissions consultant at Interview S.O.S. believes that affirmative action is a problem because it is a form of reverse discrimination. There are alternatives to affirmative action that can achieve the same goal of diversity without discriminating against certain groups.

Most people like

Find AI tools in Toolify

Join TOOLIFY to find the ai tools

Get started

Sign Up
App rating
4.9
AI Tools
20k+
Trusted Users
5000+
No complicated
No difficulty
Free forever
Browse More Content