Eye-opening account of PA poll watcher

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. Background of the Story
3. Leah's Experience as a Republican Poll Watcher
4. Chaos at the Counting Center
5. Statistical Anomalies in the Election
6. The Impact of Swing States
7. Leah's Perspective on the Fraud Allegations
8. The Plausibility of Voter Manipulation
9. Questioning the Transparency of the Election Process
10. Media Coverage and the Truth

Article

Introduction

The 2020 US Presidential Election has been surrounded by controversy and allegations of voter fraud. One of the witnesses who testified before the Senate, Leah Hoops, shares her story about her experience as a Republican poll watcher in Delaware County, Pennsylvania. In this article, we will explore the details of Leah's account and the implications it raises about the integrity of the election.

Background of the Story

Leah Hoops, a committee woman in her township, was assigned as a poll watcher on election day. However, she witnessed numerous irregularities and anomalies at both her precinct and the counting center in Chester, Pennsylvania. These events prompted her to testify before the Senate, where she alleged massive voter fraud in her county.

Leah's Experience as a Republican Poll Watcher

Leah's day started with malfunctioning scanners at her precinct, leading to delays and multiple attempts to process ballots. However, the situation escalated when she arrived at the counting center. As an observer, she was confined to a small area and had limited visibility into the actual counting process. According to Leah, this setup resembled "kabuki theater," where only specific parts of the process were selectively shown to the observers.

Chaos at the Counting Center

The counting center in Chester, Pennsylvania, was marred by chaos and lack of transparency. Leah and other observers were not allowed in the back room where pre-canvassing took place, undermining the visibility and accountability of the process. Both Republicans and Democrats were prohibited from accessing this critical area. The placement of the counting center itself was questionable, located in a secluded area with multiple entry points and elevators, enabling the movement of ballots without proper oversight.

Statistical Anomalies in the Election

Leah touched upon the statistical anomalies that raised concerns about the election results. Joe Biden's underperformance in major cities compared to Hillary Clinton's results in 2016 seemed puzzling. However, in critical swing states like Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania, Biden miraculously outperformed Clinton. This discrepancy, coupled with other irregularities, fueled doubts about the integrity of the election.

The Impact of Swing States

Leah discussed the significance of swing states like Pennsylvania, where even a few thousand votes could potentially sway the outcome. With the population and registered voter numbers in her county alone, she claimed that a relatively small number of fraudulent votes could tip the scales in favor of a particular candidate. Leah emphasized that the alleged fraud might not involve a grand global conspiracy but rather the actions of a few individuals with malicious intent.

Leah's Perspective on the Fraud Allegations

Instead of searching for a "smoking gun" or a predetermined narrative, Leah approached the fraud allegations with a level-headed perspective. She acknowledged that her observations and experiences might not constitute a massive, intricate conspiracy. Still, the absence of attempts to discredit or investigate her claims raised doubts about the legitimacy of the election process.

The Plausibility of Voter Manipulation

The conversation delved into the plausibility of voter manipulation, considering the unique circumstances of the election. The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated separate rooms and limited visibility, creating an opportunity for potential fraud. With a few like-minded individuals in a room, they could exploit the absence of proper oversight and safeguards to influence the outcome.

Questioning the Transparency of the Election Process

Leah highlighted the questionable practices she witnessed at the counting center, such as workers being secluded in separate areas and the inability to determine the source of incoming ballots. The lack of satisfactory explanations and evasive responses to her questions further added to her concerns. These issues underscored the need for transparency and equal scrutiny for all ballots to safeguard the integrity of the election.

Media Coverage and the Truth

Leah expressed her lack of surprise at the media's handling of the story, believing that they contributed to covering up any information that might contradict their preferred narrative. She expressed gratitude for outlets like Newsmax that provided a platform for individuals like her to share their experiences and voice their concerns. The need to ensure free and fair elections and restore public confidence in the process transcended partisan affiliations and called for rigorous investigation and transparency.

In conclusion, Leah Hoops' testimony sheds light on the alleged voter fraud in Delaware County, Pennsylvania. Her account raises valid questions about the integrity and transparency of the election process. While the story continues to unfold, it underscores the importance of comprehensive investigations and efforts to ensure the credibility of future elections.

Highlights

• Leah Hoops, a Republican poll watcher, testifies about alleged voter fraud in Delaware County, Pennsylvania.
• The counting center in Chester, Pennsylvania, was chaotic and lacked transparency, raising concerns about the legitimacy of the process.
• Statistical anomalies in swing states fueled doubts about the election's integrity, particularly in critical areas where Biden outperformed Clinton.
• The plausibility of voter manipulation was discussed, considering the unique circumstances of the 2020 US Presidential Election.
• The media's handling of the story and the need for transparency and scrutiny in election processes were questioned.

FAQ

Q: What evidence does Leah Hoops present to support her claims of voter fraud? A: Leah Hoops's testimony revolves around her firsthand experiences as a Republican poll watcher in Delaware County, Pennsylvania. She highlights irregularities at her precinct and the counting center, the restricted visibility and access for observers, and the statistical anomalies in swing states.

Q: Does Leah Hoops believe in a grand conspiracy or a few individuals undermining the election? A: Leah Hoops approaches the fraud allegations pragmatically, suggesting that it doesn't require a grand conspiracy. She believes that even a relatively small number of fraudulent votes in critical areas could sway the election outcome.

Q: How does Leah Hoops view the media's coverage of the alleged fraud? A: Leah Hoops expresses her lack of surprise at the media's handling of the story, stating that they appear to be covering up any information that contradicts their preferred narrative. She praises outlets like Newsmax for allowing individuals like her to voice their concerns and share their experiences.