Sidney Powell's Shocking Claims About the 'Stolen Election'

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. Involvement in the Election Effort
3. Relationship with President Trump
4. Concerns About the Election
5. Smartmatic Machines and Software
6. Allegations against Smartmatic
7. The Actual Involvement of Smartmatic
8. Errors in Allegations and Factual Accuracy
9. Litigation and Accusations
10. Conclusion

Introduction

In this article, we will dive into the details of a conversation surrounding the 2020 election. The discussion revolves around the involvement of an individual in the election effort, their relationship with President Trump, concerns about the election, allegations against Smartmatic, and the importance of factual accuracy. We will explore various aspects of the conversation and provide a comprehensive analysis of the events.

1. Involvement in the Election Effort

The interview begins with the individual talking about their unexpected involvement in the election effort following a previous association with Mr. Giuliani. They discuss how their role escalated rapidly, with people pouring in to offer help and investigate alleged irregularities in the election process. Lawyers from various parts of the country also joined the effort to support their cause.

2. Relationship with President Trump

The conversation moves on to the individual's relationship with President Trump. They confirm their previous connection and their familiarity with other key figures involved in the election. Although they cannot disclose the details of their conversations, they believe that President Trump trusted them Based on their interactions.

3. Concerns About the Election

As the election concluded and the individual found themselves in the Oval Office with the President, they express a Sense of great concern among the people present. The mathematical and statistical irregularities that occurred on election night raised suspicions for them. They admit to having prior knowledge of the potential vulnerabilities of voting machines and the possibility of tampering.

4. Smartmatic Machines and Software

The conversation now shifts towards the involvement of Smartmatic in the 2020 election. When asked about the exact number of states where Smartmatic machines and software were used, the individual admits their lack of knowledge. However, they emphasize that the focus was on the six key swing states where the voting had stopped abruptly on election night.

5. Allegations against Smartmatic

The interviewer refers to the individual's previous statement on Fox about Smartmatic shifting votes from Trump to Biden using an algorithm embedded in their machines' software. The individual is asked about their research and fact-checking at the time to validate these allegations. They express confusion and question the purpose of the interview, stating the significance of understanding Smartmatic's actual involvement in the election.

6. The Actual Involvement of Smartmatic

The interviewer challenges the individual's claims about Smartmatic by pointing out that their alleged involvement was limited to one county in California. The individual disputes this assertion, insisting that Smartmatic's involvement was more significant than portrayed. While acknowledging that Smartmatic's machines may have been used in one county, they believe their software might have been utilized in other locations.

7. Errors in Allegations and Factual Accuracy

The interviewer confronts the individual about factual errors in their allegations, particularly the claim that Smartmatic owns Dominion. The individual decides to end the interview, considering it inappropriate given the ongoing litigation. They strongly disagree with the idea that their allegations contained many errors and defends their position on various aspects related to the 2020 election.

8. Litigation and Accusations

The conversation delves into the potential consequences of the individual's involvement in the election and their comparison to Rudy Giuliani, who had his law license suspended. The individual expresses disagreement with the action taken against Giuliani, attributing it to misrepresenting facts related to the election. They assert that lawyers can make mistakes and that their intent was not to mislead but to present cases of fraud.

9. Conclusion

As the interview concludes, the individual rejects the portrayal of their position as being against the system. They emphasize that their involvement does not solely rely on them and Giuliani, stating that numerous people are part of the larger effort. The conversation ends with the anticipation of evidence being presented in court and the individual defending their actions.

Article

Introduction

The conversation discussed in this article sheds light on various aspects of the 2020 election, including the involvement of an individual in the election effort, their relationship with President Trump, concerns about the election, allegations against Smartmatic, and the importance of factual accuracy. Let's Delve into the details of this intriguing conversation and explore the different perspectives presented.

Involvement in the Election Effort

The interview begins with the individual sharing their unexpected involvement in the election effort. They mention their prior association with Mr. Giuliani, which led them to be caught up in the Wave of events surrounding the election. People flocked to them, offering help and wanting to investigate alleged irregularities. Lawyers from different parts of the country joined the endeavor, creating a frenzy of activity.

Relationship with President Trump

Moving on, the individual reveals their relationship with President Trump. They confirm a pre-existing connection and their familiarity with other key figures involved in the election. Although they are unable to disclose the specifics of their conversations, they emphasize that President Trump trusted them based on their interactions. This relationship plays a significant role in understanding their perspective on the election.

Concerns About the Election

As the conversation progresses, the individual expresses deep concern about the election. The mathematical and statistical anomalies observed on the night of the election Raise suspicions for them and many others involved. They confess to having prior knowledge of the vulnerabilities of voting machines and the possibility of tampering. These concerns contribute to their belief that something went awry.

Smartmatic Machines and Software

The conversation takes a turn towards Smartmatic, a company associated with the election. The individual is asked about the extent of Smartmatic's involvement, specifically the states where their machines and software were utilized. While lacking specific knowledge about the numbers, they highlight the significance of the six key swing states. These states became the epicenter of scrutiny due to the sudden halt in vote counting.

Allegations against Smartmatic

The interviewer confronts the individual about their previous allegations against Smartmatic. They mention the claim that Smartmatic's machines and software were used to shift votes from Trump to Biden using a Hidden algorithm. However, the interviewer questions the accuracy of these allegations and asks about the extent of the individual's research and fact-checking. This scrutiny Prompts the individual to question the purpose of the interview, asserting the importance of understanding the actual involvement of Smartmatic.

The Actual Involvement of Smartmatic

To challenge the individual’s claims further, the interviewer presents evidence suggesting that Smartmatic's involvement in the election was limited to a single county in California. However, the individual disputes this assertion, claiming that Smartmatic's involvement extends far beyond one county. They assert that while their machines may have been used in one location, their software could have been utilized elsewhere. This distinction is crucial to understanding the full extent of Smartmatic's participation.

Errors in Allegations and Factual Accuracy

The interviewer highlights errors in the individual's allegations, specifically the claim that Smartmatic owns Dominion. This prompts the individual to disagree with the characterization and decide to end the interview, citing ongoing litigation and the inappropriateness of discussing the matter. They strongly defend their position and dispute the Notion that their allegations contained numerous errors. They maintain that their intent was not to mislead but to raise awareness of potential fraud.

Litigation and Accusations

The conversation steers towards the potential repercussions of the individual's involvement in the election and draws a Parallel to Rudy Giuliani, who had his law license suspended. The individual expresses disagreement with the action taken against Giuliani, asserting that lawyers can make mistakes. They firmly believe that the extent of misrepresentation was limited and accuses those questioning their credibility of engaging in track covering.

Conclusion

As the interview draws to a close, the individual emphasizes that their involvement should not be reduced to a battle between them and the system. They underline the presence of numerous individuals working towards the same cause. The conversation ends with the anticipation of evidence being presented in court, allowing an objective assessment of the allegations made and a resolution to the ongoing disputes.