Ultimate Cleaning Battle: DEEBOT OZMO 950 vs Roomba i7 vs Roborock S5

Ultimate Cleaning Battle: DEEBOT OZMO 950 vs Roomba i7 vs Roborock S5

Table of Contents:

1. Introduction
2. Cleaning Tests 2.1. Gap Test 2.2. Corner Cleaning
3. Carpet Cleaning Ability
4. Mopping Performance
5. Comparison of Features and Intelligence 5.1. Suction Power 5.2. App-Controlled Water Flow 5.3. Cost of Ownership
6. Conclusion

Introduction

In recent years, robot vacuums have made significant advancements and the latest generation of these devices finally live up to the expectation of being called robots. In this article, we will be comparing three popular robot vacuums: the EcoVAX D bot Osmo 950, the RoboRock S5, and the iRobot Roomba i7. Our head-to-head challenge will not only determine which vacuum cleans better, but also which one is the smartest and most deserving of the term "robot".

Cleaning Tests

Gap Test

Hardwood and tile floors present their own cleaning challenges, especially when it comes to gaps and knots in the wood. These gaps can accumulate Dust and debris, often requiring strong suction power to remove them. Our gap test will compare how well each vacuum handles cleaning in these hard-to-reach areas.

For the gap test, we filled two knots and three gaps with ground coffee, totaling one and a quarter teaspoons. Each vacuum was allowed one full pass to clean the area, including the edges and center. The Contents of the dustbins were then compared to see which vacuum performed the best.

The results of the gap test are clear. While both the iRobot Roomba i7 and the RoboRock S5 did a decent job of surface-level cleaning, they struggled to remove fine particles from the gaps and knots. On the other HAND, the EcoVAX D bot Osmo 950 was able to effectively suck out almost everything, leaving only a small amount of coffee grounds in one knot and no visible Trace in the other gaps. The Osmo 950 clearly outperformed the other two vacuums in this test.

Corner Cleaning

Corners pose a special challenge for round robot vacuums, as they struggle to fit into tight spaces. We conducted a corner cleaning test to see how well each vacuum can clean in these difficult areas.

For this test, we placed a quarter cup of ground coffee in a corner and another quarter cup against the adjacent flat floorboard. Each vacuum was given two passes to clean up as much of the coffee grounds as possible. Paying Attention to the vacuum's ability to pick up fine particles, we observed that the results from the previous test held true. The EcoVAX D bot Osmo 950 left only particles on the edge of the wall, while the iRobot Roomba i7 and the RoboRock S5 scattered particles all over the floor. The Osmo 950's dual side brushes prevented the coffee grounds from being scattered, resulting in a much cleaner overall scene.

Carpet Cleaning Ability

Carpets are notorious for collecting dirt and debris, making it essential for a robot vacuum to effectively clean them. We conducted several tests to evaluate the carpet cleaning ability of the three vacuums.

In one test, we spread one tablespoon of coffee, a quarter cup of dried kidney beans, a quarter cup of Chex cereal, and a spoonful of hair along the middle of a square section of carpet. Each vacuum was allowed a single pass to clean the area, including a perimeter Sweep. The contents of the dustbins were collected and compared to assess the cleaning performance.

After evaluating the results, it became evident that all three vacuums performed fairly equally in terms of carpet cleaning. However, it was the EcoVAX D bot Osmo 950 that consistently picked up more dirt and debris, leaving a cleaner overall result.

Mopping Performance

In addition to vacuuming, the EcoVAX D bot Osmo 950 and the RoboRock S5 offer mopping capabilities. The Osmo 950 comes with a larger Water tank and enhanced mop pad design. The pads are washable and reusable, with additional disposable pads included. The 140 milliliter water tank on the RoboRock S5, built into the pad base, is smaller than the Osmo 950's 240 milliliter tank.

Controlling the amount of water used is another AdVantage of the Osmo 950, which offers four flow settings through the app. The RoboRock S5 lacks this option, both physically and through the app. The Osmo 950's design, with a padded lip on the end of the pad, proves to be more gentle and effective in catching the edges of area rugs and carpeted areas.

Comparison of Features and Intelligence

To determine the smartest and most efficient vacuum, we will compare various features and intelligent capabilities of the three vacuums.

Suction Power

While suction power is an important specification, it doesn't always reflect the overall cleaning performance. In our tests, the EcoVAX D bot Osmo 950 demonstrated superior suction power, effectively removing fine particles and debris from various surfaces.

App-Controlled Water Flow

The ability to control the water flow during mopping is a convenient feature offered by the Osmo 950. With four flow settings in the app, users can easily adjust the wetness of their floors. The RoboRock S5, on the other hand, lacks this option, limiting user control over the mopping process.

Cost of Ownership

The Osmo 950 includes washable and reusable mop pads, as well as additional disposable pads. The RoboRock S5's smaller water tank may not be sufficient for larger homes or extensive non-carpeted surfaces, potentially leading to more frequent refills. Additionally, iRobot's mopping solution is a separate product that needs to be purchased and used independently from the vacuum, increasing the overall cost of ownership.

Conclusion

After thorough testing, it is apparent that the EcoVAX D bot Osmo 950 outperforms the iRobot Roomba i7 and the RoboRock S5 in terms of cleaning performance, especially when it comes to removing fine particles from gaps and corners. Additionally, the Osmo 950 offers superior mopping capabilities, with control over water flow and effective cleaning results. Its advanced features and intelligent design make it the top choice for everyday cleaning needs.