Understanding my Rating System

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. About the Author
3. Understanding the Rating System
   • Joke Ratings
   • Treating Shows as Individual Entities
   • Reviewing the First Episode
   • Differences in Structure
4. The Real Rating System
   • F Rating
   • D Rating
   • C Rating
   • B Rating
   • A Rating
   • S Rating
   • S+ and Double S Ratings
5. Contextual Considerations
   • Narrative Glue
   • Weight of Additional Context
6. Reviewing Experience and Process
   • Dropping Shows
   • Multiple Viewings
   • Channel Content Structure

The Rating System and Reviewing Process

Reviewing tokusatsu shows can be an exciting and engaging experience, but it's essential to understand the rating system and the process behind it to get a better grasp of the reviews. In this article, we will Delve into the rating system used by the author, along with insights into the reviewing process and other important considerations.

1. Introduction

Before we venture into the details, let's introduce the author. Ricardo, also known as Zo Aito, has been reviewing tokusatsu for two years. Besides typical reviews, he also provides informational pieces, yearly entries about spending habits, and even covers award shows. Ricardo's reviewing skills vary across different shows, which can sometimes lead to confusion. This article aims to provide a proper understanding of how the rating system is used on his channel.

2. About the Author

Ricardo, a passionate tokusatsu enthusiast, presents his content in English to cater to audiences outside of the US. He emphasizes that the ratings he provides are a reflection of his personal opinions, and disagreements are common. The purpose of this article is to help viewers understand how he evaluates shows and movies and to unravel the intricacies of his review process.

3. Understanding the Rating System

Ricardo employs a comprehensive rating system to assess the quality of tokusatsu shows. To fully comprehend his ratings, it is crucial to understand certain aspects of his approach.

Joke Ratings

Occasionally, Ricardo incorporates joke ratings into his reviews. These ratings are meant to be taken lightheartedly and are clearly indicated as such. For example, the "miraculous D" is intentionally created as a joke rating for specific shows that warrant such humorous treatment.

Treating Shows as Individual Entities

Ricardo believes in treating each Show and its supplemental content as its own entity. Drawing an analogy to school subjects, he explains that different seasons of a series can be likened to different disciplines. Consequently, one should not expect a show from a particular season to be judged Based on the same standard as another. Each show is evaluated according to its unique qualities and storytelling approach.

Reviewing the First Episode

Ricardo follows a specific pattern when reviewing certain shows. For example, for Super Sentai, he reviews the first episode and then waits for four episodes before resuming the reviews. This approach allows him to gauge the direction and potential of the show after a few episodes. Super Sentai, with its traditional structure of introducing the main task within the first few episodes, requires this time to comprehensively assess its trajectory.

Differences in Structure

Common Rider, on the other HAND, often follows a different structure. With an ever-expanding character roster and evolving storytelling dynamics, Common Rider offers more variables to consider. As a result, the presentation and analysis of each show can vary significantly, adding complexity to the reviewing process. Therefore, shows with a more serialized and serious tone receive a more critical evaluation compared to those that showcase a lighthearted and nonsensical approach.

4. The Real Rating System

Now, let's dive into Ricardo's actual rating system. Understanding these ratings will provide valuable Insight into how he perceives and evaluates tokusatsu shows.

F Rating

The F rating is the lowest rating given to shows that are fundamentally flawed or considered a 5 out of 10 or lower. Although Ricardo hasn't given a straight zero yet, an F rating signifies significant shortcomings.

D Rating

The D rating, equivalent to a six out of 10, categorizes shows that are below average or not particularly great. While some grading systems may qualify a 6 out of 10 as an F, Ricardo distinguishes it as a separate rating.

C Rating

The C rating, representing a seven out of 10, signifies an average show that meets the expectations set forth. While there may be nothing outstanding about it, it still manages to deliver a satisfactory experience.

B Rating

A show that receives a B rating is considered good, equivalent to an eight out of 10. Despite some setbacks, it generally meets or exceeds expectations.

A Rating

The A rating, a nine out of 10, denotes a show that is great and highly enjoyable. It may have minor limitations, but overall, it leaves a positive impression.

S Rating

The S rating is the pinnacle of excellence, representing a perfect 10 out of 10. A show that receives this rating has surpassed all expectations and flawlessly executed every aspect.

S+ and Double S Ratings

Occasionally, certain exceptional shows may receive higher ratings, such as S+ or even Double S. These ratings denote extraordinary performances that go beyond perfection.

5. Contextual Considerations

Ricardo believes in acknowledging the uniqueness of each show and refraining from universal judgments. Unless explicitly connected to pre-established shows, each season or series should be evaluated independently. While some shows may share similarities, the additional context required can either hinder or enrich the overall experience. It is essential to recognize and appreciate the distinctiveness of each production.

6. Reviewing Experience and Process

Ricardo's reviewing process is Shaped by his extensive experience and commitment to providing thorough analyses. While he has dropped a few shows in the past, he aims to revisit them in the future to provide a fair assessment. He watches each episode multiple times, averaging at least five viewings before finalizing his thoughts. This meticulous approach allows him to identify nuances and track the evolution of shows over time. Additionally, Ricardo's content is structured with regular Twitch and YouTube streams, ensuring an interactive and engaging experience for his audience.

In conclusion, understanding Ricardo's rating system and reviewing process is essential for interpreting his tokusatsu reviews accurately. By taking into account the unique aspects of each show, appreciating individual context, and considering the distinctive qualities of different ratings, viewers can gain a deeper understanding of the reviews they watch and look forward to future content from Ricardo.