Unveiling Algorithm Bias: How AI Can Fail Us
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- What is Algorithm Bias?
- Sources of Algorithm Bias
- Biased Data
- Biased Design and Use
- Examples of Algorithm Bias
- Facial Recognition Algorithms
- Language Translation Algorithms
- Acquiring User Biases
- Measuring Algorithm Bias
- The Social Construction of Bias
- Mitigating Algorithm Bias
- Conclusion
Algorithm Bias: Understanding and Mitigating Bias in Algorithms
Algorithms have become an integral part of our lives, powering everything from mobile phones and the internet to advanced medical imaging technologies. However, algorithms can also be biased, reflecting legally or ethically problematic discrimination Based on attributes such as race, gender, age, sexual orientation, religion, and more. In this article, we will explore the sources of algorithm bias, examine examples of algorithm bias, and discuss how algorithm designers, policymakers, and civil society groups can work together to mitigate algorithm bias.
What is Algorithm Bias?
Algorithm bias refers to the ways in which algorithms can reflect and perpetuate societal biases and discrimination. Bias can arise from the data used to train algorithms, as well as from the people who design and use them. In a world awash in data about our lives, it is important to recognize that not all groups have equal access to opportunities such as education, financial services, and jobs. As a result, data can reflect broader biases in society, and can be used and interpreted in biased ways.
Sources of Algorithm Bias
There are two main sources of algorithm bias: biased data and biased design and use.
Biased Data
Data can be biased in a number of ways. For example, if most of the images used to train a facial recognition algorithm are of people with lighter skin, the algorithm will perform poorly when analyzing faces of people with darker skin. This can occur if the engineers who choose the training data don't sufficiently expose the algorithm to the different types of faces the algorithm will encounter. Bad training data is a common source of AI bias.
Biased Design and Use
Algorithms can also be biased if they are designed or used in biased ways. For example, Amazon developed an AI Tool to screen resumes submitted by applicants, but the AI was trained using resumes from previous years, a group dominated by men. It learned to reduce the scores of applicants with information identifying them as female. Language translation algorithms can also have bias, as they are trained by analyzing huge numbers of language samples, which can acquire biases.
Examples of Algorithm Bias
Algorithm bias can have serious consequences. Let's look at two examples: facial recognition algorithms and language translation algorithms.
Facial Recognition Algorithms
Facial recognition algorithms are trained by showing them images of lots of faces. In general, the more face images an algorithm can analyze when it is being trained, the better it will become at performing facial recognition. However, a problem occurs when the database of training images isn't diverse enough. There have been repeated instances of African Americans who were falsely arrested because a facial recognition algorithm mistook them for someone else. In 2019, an innocent New Jersey man was incorrectly identified using a facial recognition algorithm and then arrested. He spent 10 days in jail before being released. Unfortunately, bad training data is a common source of AI bias.
Language Translation Algorithms
Translation algorithms are trained by analyzing huge numbers of language samples. However, since language is often used in a biased manner, an algorithm trained with language samples can acquire those biases. In a 2017 paper, researchers from Princeton University and the University of Bath showed that when they used Google Translate to translate the sentence "she is a doctor" into Turkish, which is a gender-neutral language, and then back to English, the result was "he is a doctor." The sentence "he is a nurse," when translated into Turkish and then back to English, became "she is a nurse." Bringing Attention to these sorts of biases can help spur algorithm designers to update their algorithms.
Acquiring User Biases
Even algorithms that are initially non-biased can acquire their users' own biases and beliefs. For example, if a person repeatedly searches for and watches videos promoting a conspiracy theory, an algorithm designed to learn and adapt to viewing preferences can start suggesting other similar videos promoting that same conspiracy theory.
Measuring Algorithm Bias
It's not always easy to define bias, and there are multiple different ways to measure bias. For example, if an algorithm used to screen job applications recommends hiring 15 of the 20 men who applied and 18 of the 24 women who applied, is there gender bias in the outputs of this algorithm? In one respect, the answer might be no, because 75 percent of the male applicants and 75 percent of the female applicants who applied were recommended. But what if the female applicants were on average significantly more qualified than the male applicants? Viewed in this light, the algorithm is biased because it failed to produce recommendations reflecting the stronger female applicant pool.
The Social Construction of Bias
Bias isn't a purely mathematical concept; it's also socially constructed. A decision that one person might consider fair might be considered biased by someone else. Math can help us to understand algorithm bias and help to mitigate it, but only if we first decide how We Are going to define bias. Depending on the situation and on the goals and perspectives of the people designing and using the algorithm, there may not be a single right way to measure bias.
Mitigating Algorithm Bias
There are several ways to mitigate algorithm bias. One approach is to increase the diversity of the data used to train algorithms. Another approach is to involve a diverse group of people in the design and use of algorithms. It is also important to regularly test algorithms for bias and to make adjustments as needed. Finally, policymakers can play a role in regulating the use of algorithms and ensuring that they are used in ways that are fair and ethical.
Conclusion
Algorithm bias is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires attention from algorithm designers, policymakers, and civil society groups. By understanding the sources of algorithm bias, examining examples of algorithm bias, and discussing ways to measure and mitigate algorithm bias, we can work together to Create algorithms that are fair, ethical, and beneficial for all.