Inside the Open AI Board Turmoil

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. Open AI's Board Drama
   1. Pledges to leave without Sam Alman
   2. High stakes and cutthroat competition
   3. Current board members and their stance
3. The Comical CEO Hunt
   1. Four people approached for CEO position
   2. Dario Amade's rejection and the merger offer
   3. Open AI and Anthropics as direct competitors
4. Similarities between Amade and Alman
   1. Amade's focus on safety and regulation
   2. Constitutional AI model and alignment with Open AI's principles
   3. Commercialization and safety goals
5. Blow up Open AI for Amade?
   1. Alman's brilliance and value to Open AI
   2. Silence of the board members
6. Conclusion

Open AI's Board Drama

Open AI, one of the most significant companies in human history, is currently facing a crisis due to internal conflicts within its board. The situation has reached a point where almost all its employees have pledged to leave unless Sam Alman is reinstated as the head of the organization. The gravity of the issue is magnified by the fact that Open AI offers highly competitive salaries and works on groundbreaking technologies. In light of this, the actions of three individuals on the board, namely Adam D'Angelo, Tasha Mcau, and Helen Tona, hold the fate of the company.

The Comical CEO Hunt

In an attempt to stabilize the company, Open AI's board has made comical choices in their search for a new CEO. They have approached multiple candidates, including Mera Moradi (CTO), former GitHub CEO Nat Fredman, Scale AI CEO Alex Wang, and finally, EMT Shear (co-founder of Twitch) before settling on the most bizarre choice, Dario Amade, the CEO of Anthropics.

The board even went to the extent of offering to merge Open AI with Anthropics to entice Amade. This proposition is incredibly bewildering, as Anthropics and Open AI are direct competitors in the field of Generative AI. Such a merger would undoubtedly attract government scrutiny, considering the potential influence these companies hold in the development of artificial general intelligence.

Similarities between Amade and Alman

Dario Amade's decision to decline the offer is not surprising. He recognizes the value of his own company and understands the complexities of merging competitors. However, a closer look reveals striking similarities between Amade and Sam Alman, the former CEO of Open AI. Both individuals have shown a strong commitment to safety and regulation in the development of AI. Anthropics has even developed a constitutional AI model, which aligns with Open AI's principles, providing a transparent and adjustable system.

Moreover, both Amade and Alman share a focus on the mixture of commercialization and safety, which is crucial for the responsible advancement of AI technology. Given these similarities, it seems perplexing that the board would consider blowing up Open AI to bring Amade on board.

Blow up Open AI for Amade?

The decision to prioritize Amade over Alman is questionable, especially considering Alman's brilliance and his ability to rally the entire workforce of Open AI. It is disconcerting that the board members, Adam D'Angelo, Tasha Mcau, and Helen Tona, have remained silent throughout these tumultuous events, leaving many to speculate about their intentions and decision-making process.

In conclusion, the future of Open AI hangs in the balance. While there is hope for reconciliation and resolution, the actions of the board have raised concerns about their strategic decisions. The repercussions of their choices may Shape the trajectory of Open AI and its contributions to the world of AI technology.