Unboxing and Review: The Ultimate Tekno ET48 2.0 Bash Test

Unboxing and Review: The Ultimate Tekno ET48 2.0 Bash Test

Table of Contents:

1. Introduction
2. Techno ET48 2.0: A Great Race Kit
3. Techno ET48 2.0 as a Basher 3.1 Lack of Bumpers 3.2 Lightweight Design 3.3 Limited Space 3.4 Custom Modifications 3.5 Durability Concerns
4. Creighton EXP: A Comparable Alternative
5. Breakages and Repairs 5.1 Impact on Shock Shaft and Cap 5.2 Bent Shock Housing 5.3 Comparison to Armors
6. Conclusion

Techno ET48 2.0: Is it a Great Basher?

When it comes to remote control cars, the Techno ET48 2.0 is often hailed as a top-quality racing kit. However, in terms of bashing capabilities, it may not live up to the expectations set by other brands like Traxxas and Arma. In this article, we will examine the reasons why the Techno ET48 2.0 falls short as a basher and why other alternatives such as the Creighton EXP may be more suitable for this purpose.

Introduction

The Techno ET48 2.0 has gained a reputation as a superior racing kit, boasting top-quality parts and a smooth assembly process. Its lightweight design and improved part quality have been key selling points. However, when it comes to bashing, some enthusiasts argue that it may not be the best choice. In this article, we will Delve into the reasons behind this claim and explore other options that offer more suitable features for bashing purposes.

Techno ET48 2.0 as a Basher

While the Techno ET48 2.0 excels on the racetrack, it falls short in terms of bashing capabilities. There are several reasons why this may be the case.

3.1 Lack of Bumpers

One significant drawback of the Techno ET48 2.0 as a basher is the absence of bumpers. Unlike brands like Arma and Traxxas, which offer large, squishy bumpers that protect the vehicle during impacts, the Techno ET48 2.0 lacks this crucial feature. This means that if You want to transform it into a basher, you will need to find aftermarket solutions, which may be limited in availability due to the lower demand for such parts.

3.2 Lightweight Design

The Techno ET48 2.0 is designed to be lightweight, which is advantageous for racing purposes. However, when it comes to bashing, a HEAVIER vehicle often performs better, as it can withstand more impact without sustaining damage. The Creighton EXP, for example, offers a more robust chassis and additional bracing out of the box, making it better equipped for bashing activities.

3.3 Limited Space

Another issue with the Techno ET48 2.0 is its limited space for components. While it may accommodate certain battery sizes, it poses challenges for users who prefer larger battery configurations. Additionally, the layout of the vehicle may require custom modifications to fit specific parts, such as the ESC and receiver box, further complicating the process of transforming it into a basher.

3.4 Custom Modifications

To make the Techno ET48 2.0 suitable for bashing, various custom modifications may be necessary. This includes installing additional bracing, upgrading the servo, and waterproofing the receiver box. While some hobbyists enjoy customizing their vehicles, others may prefer a ready-to-bash option that requires fewer modifications.

3.5 Durability Concerns

The durability of the Techno ET48 2.0 has also been called into question. Reports suggest that the drivelines and differentials may not hold up well to the demands of bashing, even when not subjected to extreme power systems. Some users have experienced bent driveshafts and issues with the differentials, which may limit the vehicle's reliability and longevity as a basher.

Creighton EXP: A Comparable Alternative

If bashing is your primary goal, there are alternative options that may better suit your needs. One such option is the Creighton EXP, which offers comparable performance to the Techno ET48 2.0 at a more affordable price point. The Creighton EXP boasts a sturdy chassis, heavy-duty drivelines, and improved differentials, making it a more Durable and capable bashing machine.

Breakages and Repairs

One factor that may deter bashing enthusiasts from choosing the Techno ET48 2.0 is the frequency of breakages and subsequent repairs.

5.1 Impact on Shock Shaft and Cap

Even minor crashes can result in significant breakages on the Techno ET48 2.0. The shock shaft and cap are particularly vulnerable to damage, requiring replacements that add to the overall cost of ownership. This fragility stands in contrast to other brands like Arma, where shocks are known to withstand considerable abuse without breaking.

5.2 Bent Shock Housing

The Techno ET48 2.0's shock housing is another component prone to damage. A single impact can bend the housing, rendering it incompatible with the shock, and necessitating additional replacement parts. This issue further highlights the durability shortcomings of the Techno ET48 2.0 compared to alternatives like the Creighton EXP.

5.3 Comparison to Armors

In comparison to brands like Arma, which have developed a strong reputation for durability, the Techno ET48 2.0 falls behind. The robustness of Arma's shock housing and overall build quality make it a more reliable choice for bashing enthusiasts.

Conclusion

While the Techno ET48 2.0 excels as a racing kit, it may not meet the expectations of bashing enthusiasts. Factors such as the lack of bumpers, lightweight design, limited space for customizations, and concerns regarding durability make it a less suitable option for bashing activities. Alternatives like the Creighton EXP offer more robust features at a lower price point. So, if you're primarily interested in bashing, it might be wise to explore other options that better meet your requirements.