Unleashing ChatGPT: Your Ultimate Web Browsing Companion

Unleashing ChatGPT: Your Ultimate Web Browsing Companion

Table of Contents:

1. Introduction
2. The Disappearance of the Web Browsing Feature in Chat GPT
3. The Return of the Web Browsing Feature
4. Comparing Chat GPT's Web Browsing Capability
   • 4.1 Comparison with Bard and Bing Chat
   • 4.2 Analyzing the Performance in Different Scenarios
5. Limitations of Chat GPT's Web Browsing Feature
   • 5.1 Lack of Tailored Responses
   • 5.2 Inadequate Use in Exam Preparation
   • 5.3 Reluctance to Access the Web
   • 5.4 Gathering Information from YouTube
6. Comparing Chat GPT with Bing Chat Enterprise
   • 6.1 Current Affairs
   • 6.2 Tech How-to Information
   • 6.3 Extracting Information from Wikipedia
   • 6.4 Providing Counterpoint Articles
7. Interrogating Chat GPT on its New Web Browsing Feature
8. Room for Improvement in Chat GPT's Web Browsing Implementation
9. Conclusion

Title: The Return of Web Browsing in Chat GPT: A Comparative Analysis

Introduction The disappearance of the web browsing feature in Chat GPT left many users disappointed. However, it has recently made a comeback, albeit with some differences. In this article, we will explore the return of web browsing in Chat GPT and compare its performance to other tools like Bard and Bing Chat. We will also examine the limitations of Chat GPT's web browsing feature and analyze its use in various scenarios. Furthermore, we will delve into the comparison between Chat GPT and Bing Chat Enterprise, exploring their responses to current affairs, tech how-to queries, information extraction from Wikipedia, and providing counterpoint articles. Lastly, we will discuss the potential for improvement in Chat GPT's web browsing implementation.

The Disappearance of the Web Browsing Feature in Chat GPT A few months ago, users were taken aback when one of Chat GPT's most useful features, accessing current web results with Bing, vanished. This feature had been favored due to its ability to provide comprehensive results on various topics. However, OpenAI decided to remove this capability as it was found to circumvent protections on paywalled content. Consequently, the feature was shelved, leaving users without this valuable resource.

The Return of the Web Browsing Feature To the delight of many, the web browsing feature has come back to Chat GPT, albeit in a slightly different form. Users can now access the browse with Bing beta feature by turning it on in the settings. This enhancement allows users to leverage the web browsing capability of Chat GPT. However, it is important to note that the information and accounts showcased in demos are either simulated or publicly accessible data.

Comparing Chat GPT's Web Browsing Capability 4.1 Comparison with Bard and Bing Chat In a previous video, a comparison was made between Chat GPT's web access and Bard and Bing Chat. Although all three tools utilize the same web index and underlying GPT-4 model for generating responses, Chat GPT's web browsing feature provided more comprehensive results. The reimplementation of this feature in Chat GPT opens up new possibilities for users.

4.2 Analyzing the Performance in Different Scenarios Several scenarios were tested to assess the performance of Chat GPT's web browsing feature. In the first scenario, Chat GPT was asked to help with the Power Platform by breaking it down into relatable analogies and examples. The old version of Chat GPT struggled, whereas the new web tool provided a basic format response - although it may have gone too deep into creating analogies. The speed and lack of hang-ups were noticeable improvements.

In another test, Chat GPT was requested to Create a study guide for the PL-100 App Maker exam. Surprisingly, neither the old nor the new version initiated a web search to access the latest information on the exam syllabus. This raises concerns about relying solely on internal knowledge for dynamically changing topics.

Moreover, the ability to fetch information from YouTube was evaluated using Chat GPT's web browsing feature. While both the old and new versions performed better than Bard's YouTube extension, Chat GPT's response seemed to lack contextual understanding and depth. It appeared to prefer recent videos over popular ones, indicating a potential limitation in its information gathering from YouTube.

Limitations of Chat GPT's Web Browsing Feature 5.1 Lack of Tailored Responses Comparing the responses of Chat GPT with and without the web browsing feature, it is evident that the new implementation fails to provide tailored answers. Whether it's about exam preparation or specific requirements, the responses seem generic and not tailored to the user's needs.

5.2 Inadequate Use in Exam Preparation When it comes to exam preparation, particularly for subjects with frequently changing syllabi, a web search is vital to gather the latest information. However, Chat GPT's web browsing feature does not utilize this capability effectively. It relies heavily on internal knowledge and neglects the dynamic nature of exam requirements.

5.3 Reluctance to Access the Web Both the previous and current versions of Chat GPT exhibit reluctance to access the web through their web browsing feature. Despite the feature being turned on, Chat GPT often resorts to its internal knowledge rather than opting to confirm information from trustworthy sources online.

5.4 Gathering Information from YouTube In terms of fetching information from YouTube, Chat GPT's web browsing feature performs reasonably well. However, it appears to prioritize recent videos over popular ones. This suggests a potential gap in contextual understanding and comprehensive access to YouTube content.

Comparing Chat GPT with Bing Chat Enterprise 6.1 Current Affairs When comparing Chat GPT's web browsing capability with Bing Chat Enterprise, there is a noticeable difference in the range of sources used to provide current affairs information. While Chat GPT relies on a single source like Reuters world news, Bing Chat draws from multiple sources, including MSN News, BBC, CNN, and Sky News. This broader range of sources ensures a more comprehensive coverage of current events.

6.2 Tech How-to Information In the context of tech how-to information, Bing Chat again proves to be more expansive. When asked about activating Jet AI for Google Workspace, Chat GPT cites only one resource, while Bing Chat provides a variety of resources, offering a more comprehensive answer to the query.

6.3 Extracting Information from Wikipedia Chat GPT's web browsing feature falls short when it comes to extracting information from Wikipedia. While both Chat GPT and Bing Chat manage to provide information about a specific web page, Bing Chat goes further by including additional details from other web pages. This indicates that Chat GPT's web browsing feature may need improvement in gathering information from specific web pages.

6.4 Providing Counterpoint Articles When tasked with finding counterpoint articles related to a specific topic, both Chat GPT and Bing Chat offer suitable responses. However, Bing Chat's response is once again more expansive and provides a wider array of resources compared to Chat GPT.

Interrogating Chat GPT on its New Web Browsing Feature Chat GPT itself can be questioned about its new web browsing feature. It can provide information about the capabilities of the tool named "browser" and offer a comparison between the new and old versions. Chat GPT's responses shed light on the functionalities of the new browser tool and its customization options.

Room for Improvement in Chat GPT's Web Browsing Implementation Based on a comparison between the previous web browsing capability of Chat GPT and its current implementation, it is evident that the new version has room for improvement. Chat GPT tends to rely too heavily on its internal knowledge and is often slow to reach out to the web for verification. Users may expect the web browsing feature to provide the latest information, but it often falls short by relying on a single source. While the new implementation is quicker, it does not fully leverage the potential of web browsing. Further enhancements are necessary to ensure more comprehensive and up-to-date results.

Conclusion The return of web browsing in Chat GPT is a welcome addition for users. However, a comparative analysis with Bard and Bing Chat reveals that there is still room for improvement. The new web browsing feature in Chat GPT shows reluctance to access the web and lacks tailored responses in certain scenarios. It is crucial to recognize its limitations, especially when it comes to exam preparation and gathering information from YouTube. Despite this, Chat GPT's web browsing feature offers faster responses and can serve as a valuable tool. With further development, it has the potential to provide users with comprehensive and up-to-date information from the web.