Ryzen 4000 vs Intel 10th-gen: The Battle of XMG Core 15

Find AI Tools
No difficulty
No complicated process
Find ai tools

Ryzen 4000 vs Intel 10th-gen: The Battle of XMG Core 15

Table of Contents:

  1. Introduction
  2. Background: Review of the Asus Tough Gaming A15
  3. XMG's Approach to Ryzen and Intel Laptops
  4. Design and Specifications of the XMG Core15
  5. Performance Benchmarks: productivity Workloads
    • Cinebench R20
    • Adobe Acrobat PDF Exporting
    • Handbrake Video Rendering
    • Excel and MATLAB
    • 7zip Compression and Decompression
    • Cygwin and Chromium Compilation
  6. Performance Benchmarks: GPU-Accelerated Workloads
    • Photoshop
    • Adobe Premiere
    • DaVinci Resolve
  7. Thermals and Noise Output
  8. Battery Life and Efficiency
  9. Conclusion
  10. FAQs

🖥️ Benchmarking the XMG Core15: A Comprehensive Review

Introducing the XMG Core15, a laptop model that has been generating quite a buzz within the tech community. In this two-part series, we will be exploring the capabilities of this device, which comes in both AMD Ryzen and Intel variants. But what makes this laptop truly unique is its identical design for both configurations, allowing for an apples-to-apples comparison. In this article, we will dive into the specifications, performance benchmarks, thermals, and battery life of the XMG Core15. Let's dig in and see just how this laptop stacks up!

1. Introduction

Laptop brand XMG has caught the attention of many tech enthusiasts, thanks to their Ryzen and Intel-based laptops. The Core15, designed by ODM Tongfang, serves as the perfect backdrop for comparing AMD and Intel processors. With the Ryzen 7 4800H and Intel Core i7-10750H as the key components in this review, we can expect some intriguing performance differences. But before we delve into the benchmarks, let's take a closer look at the background and design of the XMG Core15.

2. Background: Review of the Asus Tough Gaming A15

To fully appreciate the XMG Core15, we must first acknowledge its origins. The laptop's journey began with the analysis of the Asus Tough Gaming A15, a popular option among gamers. XMG took Notice of the trends and feedback generated by our analysis of the Asus laptop, which prompted them to reach out to us. As a result, we were able to explore the capabilities of XMG's Ryzen 4000-based laptops, as well as their Intel counterparts. This paved the way for an exciting exploration of the XMG Core15's performance and optimization.

3. XMG's Approach to Ryzen and Intel Laptops

In our discussions with XMG, they made it clear that they wanted to provide a fair and comprehensive comparison of their AMD and Intel laptops. They emphasized that they didn't just "jump on the AMD bandwagon," but rather, they had put significant effort into optimizing both configurations. This optimization included power delivery, thermal design, and overall performance. As a result, we can expect a well-rounded experience from both the Ryzen and Intel models of the XMG Core15.

4. Design and Specifications of the XMG Core15

The XMG Core15, based on Tongfang's design, features a sleek and sturdy metal chassis that exudes elegance. Its slim profile and lightweight construction make it highly portable, making it an ideal choice for users on the go. The keyboard and trackpad offer a comfortable and responsive experience, adding to the overall usability of the device.

Under the hood, the XMG Core15 houses impressive specifications. In both the AMD and Intel models, you'll find a Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 GPU, 16GB of dual-Channel DDR4 memory, and a 512GB M.2 SSD. The icing on the cake is the beautiful 1080p 144Hz IPS display, which ensures smooth visuals and excellent color accuracy. These baseline specifications set the stage for our performance benchmarks.

5. Performance Benchmarks: Productivity Workloads

Now, let's get to the exciting part: the performance benchmarks. Our aim is to gauge the XMG Core15's capabilities in various productivity workloads. By comparing the Ryzen 7 4800H and the Intel Core i7-10750H, we can gain valuable insights into their relative strengths and weaknesses.

Cinebench R20

In the multi-threaded Cinebench R20 test, the XMG Core15 with the Ryzen 7 4800H takes the lead. With a power limit of 72 watts, the AMD model outperforms its Intel counterpart by a significant margin. In fact, the Ryzen 7 4800H comes remarkably close to matching the performance of a desktop Ryzen 7 3700X. This result highlights the exceptional performance of the AMD processor in heavily threaded workloads.

Adobe Acrobat PDF Exporting

When it comes to single-threaded performance, the Intel Core i7-10750H has a slight advantage. This becomes evident in tasks like Adobe Acrobat PDF exporting, where the Intel model outpaces the AMD model by 12%. However, the Ryzen 7 4800H still holds its ground and remains a competitive choice for most productivity tasks.

Handbrake Video Rendering

In CPU-only video rendering workloads, the power-boosted Ryzen 7 4800H shines. It consistently outperforms the Intel Core i7-10750H, delivering a 49% performance advantage in Handbrake. This massive performance gap highlights the superiority of the AMD configuration when it comes to CPU-centric tasks.

Excel and MATLAB

For users working with Excel and MATLAB, the XMG Core15 with the Ryzen 7 4800H continues to impress. It outpaces the Intel model by 8% and 7% respectively. These results indicate that the AMD configuration offers a tangible advantage in scenarios that involve heavy number-crunching and computational work.

7zip Compression and Decompression

7zip compression and decompression workloads Present an interesting Scenario. While the Ryzen 7 4800H excels in decompression, boasting a 54% performance advantage, the gap narrows to just 11% in compression tasks. This disparity can be attributed to the AMD CPU's efficiency and its ability to make the most of the thermal design.

Cygwin and Chromium Compilation

Both Cygwin and Chromium compilation heavily rely on CPU performance. In these workloads, the Ryzen 7 4800H emerges as the preferred choice once again. With a 42% advantage in Cygwin compile times and a 17% advantage in Chromium compilation, the AMD configuration proves its worth in demanding software development tasks.

[Rest of the article content truncated due to character limit]

Most people like

Are you spending too much time looking for ai tools?
App rating
4.9
AI Tools
100k+
Trusted Users
5000+
WHY YOU SHOULD CHOOSE TOOLIFY

TOOLIFY is the best ai tool source.

Browse More Content