The New Best Value Budget GPU of 2023! Intel Arc A750 Review

Table of Contents

• Introduction
• Is the Intel Arc A750 Worth the Hype?
• Comparing Specs: Intel Arc A750 vs other GPUs
• Performance at 1080p Rasterization
• Performance at 1440p Rasterization
• The Value Proposition: Intel Arc A750
• Power Consumption and Efficiency
• Ray Tracing Performance at 1080p
• Ray Tracing Performance at 1440p
• The Power of Intel Arc A750 in productivity
• Overclocking the Intel Arc A750
• Conclusion

Is the Intel Arc A750 Worth the Hype?

The Intel Arc A750 has had a tumultuous journey, but recent developments have made it a top contender in the GPU market. Despite a rocky start with poor drivers and launching during the GPU shortage, the Arc A750 has proven its worth with recent improvements. Priced at just $199, it offers exceptional value, surpassing even the 6650 XT. With impressive specifications comparable to high-end GPUs like the 3060 Ti, the Arc A750 delivers solid performance at an affordable price. In this article, we will delve deeper into the Arc A750's capabilities and compare it to other GPUs in its price range.

Comparing Specs: Intel Arc A750 vs other GPUs

When examining the specifications of the Intel Arc A750, several key features stand out. It rivals the 3060 in terms of cores and boasts significantly higher TMU and ROP counts, even surpassing the 3060 Ti and the 6650 XT. While it may have slightly fewer cores, its identical memory bus puts it on par with the 3060 Ti. Additionally, the Arc A750 boasts higher clocks and memory speeds than the 3060, making it a formidable competitor. However, it is essential to consider the price factor when evaluating the Arc A750's value proposition.

Performance at 1080p Rasterization

In terms of performance at 1080p rasterization, the Arc A750 showcases noteworthy results. It outperforms both the 6650 XT and the 3060 in certain games, such as Cyberpunk 2077. However, it falls short in a few instances, even underperforming compared to the 1660. While Intel has made improvements in drivers for newer, more demanding games, there is room for enhancement in older APIs. Nonetheless, considering the average numbers, the 3060 and the 6650 XT outperform the Arc A750 by approximately 24%. However, the significant price difference makes the Arc A750 an enticing option.

Performance at 1440p Rasterization

Although the Arc A750 is not primarily designed for 1440p gaming, it still portrays impressive performance in certain scenarios. In games like Cyberpunk 2077, the Arc A750 leads other mid-range cards, surpassing them. However, there is room for improvement in most other cases. The 3060 maintains its lead over the Arc A750 in terms of average FPS, outperforming it by approximately 30%. Similarly, the 6650 XT surpasses the Arc A750 by 33%. Despite its comparable specifications to the 3060 Ti, the Arc A750 falls significantly behind, with the 3060 Ti outperforming it by 57%.

The Value Proposition: Intel Arc A750

The Arc A750's value proposition is truly where it shines. Despite not impressing in terms of overall performance in both 1080p and 1440p rasterization, the Arc A750 leads the Chart in performance per dollar. It surpasses the previous value king, the 6650 XT, by 11%, showcasing its exceptional value. Moreover, it draws 9% less power than the 3060, making it an energy-efficient option. However, its overall average efficiency is not remarkable, placing it at the bottom of the chart compared to other GPUs. Nevertheless, the Arc A750's competitive price and satisfactory performance make it a compelling choice for budget-conscious gamers.

Power Consumption and Efficiency

When considering power consumption, the Arc A750 falls in the middle ground. It draws 13% more power than the 6650 XT but remains 5% more efficient than the 3060. Its overall efficiency is not exceptional, with the 6650 XT leading in this aspect, being 45% more efficient. Even the 3060 delivers 13% more performance per watt than the Arc A750. These findings highlight the potential for further driver improvements to enhance the card's performance and energy efficiency.

Ray Tracing Performance at 1080p

The tables turn when it comes to ray tracing performance at 1080p. The Arc A750 delivers surprisingly satisfactory results, even surpassing the 3060 in certain games, such as Hitman. It outperforms the two Radeon cards more often than not, showcasing the effects of driver improvements. In terms of average FPS, the Arc A750 outperforms the 6650 XT by 22% and ranks closely with the 3060, with a mere 10% difference.

Ray Tracing Performance at 1440p

The impressive ray tracing performance continues at 1440p, with the Arc A750 still prevailing over the 6650 XT. In Hitman 3, it even surpasses the 3060 Ti, solidifying its position. The average FPS at 1440p places the Arc A750 ahead of the 6650 XT by 26%, with the 3060 maintaining a 16% lead.

The Power of Intel Arc A750 in Productivity

Beyond gaming capabilities, the Arc A750 proves its worth in productivity benchmarks. In Premiere Pro, it outperforms the 3060 by 5% and the 6650 XT by 27%. While it falls behind the 3060 in After Effects by 34%, it still surpasses the 6650 XT by 4%. These results highlight the Arc A750's versatility and efficiency in handling productivity tasks.

Overclocking the Intel Arc A750

Overclocking the Intel Arc A750 presents some nuances compared to traditional methods. The clock controls for the core and memory are adjusted through the Arc Control software, using a percentage-based curve determined by the GPU performance boost slider. However, voltage can still be Altered through an offset, and the power limit can be maximized. Overclocking the Arc A750 yields a modest 2% increase in average FPS in the Heaven benchmark. However, the average power draw increases by 31%, along with an 8% rise in average temperature and a 20% increase in noise levels. These results reveal that overclocking may not significantly enhance performance, and further improvements from Intel are necessary.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Intel Arc A750 is a surprising contender in the GPU market. Despite encountering challenges such as poor initial drivers and launching during the GPU shortage, recent improvements have transformed it into an excellent value proposition. Priced at just $199, it offers solid performance comparable to higher-end options like the 3060 Ti. While it may not be the most efficient GPU, its competitive pricing and satisfactory performance make it an attractive choice for budget-conscious gamers. With continued driver improvements and optimizations, Intel has the potential to further advance its standing in the GPU market.