Unleash the Power: Exploring the Performance of AMD Threadripper CPUs

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. AMD Threadripper CPUs
3. Performance of Threadripper CPUs
4. Differences between Linux and Windows performance
5. Performance regression on Windows
6. AMD's solutions: Rison and dynamic local mode
7. Performance improvements with dynamic local mode
8. The 24-core Threadripper 2970 WX
9. The value of the 2970 WX compared to the 2990 WX
10. Gaming performance on Threadripper CPUs
11. Conclusion

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss AMD's Threadripper CPUs and their performance in various scenarios. We will compare the performance of Threadripper CPUs on different operating systems, specifically Linux and Windows. We will also explore the performance regression experienced by Threadripper CPUs on Windows and the solutions provided by AMD to address this issue. Additionally, we will analyze the performance improvements achieved with the implementation of dynamic local mode. We will conclude by discussing the value and performance of the 24-core Threadripper 2970 WX and its comparison to the 32-core Threadripper 2990 WX. Finally, we will touch upon gaming performance on Threadripper CPUs.

AMD Threadripper CPUs

AMD's Threadripper CPUs, specifically the 12-core and 24-core versions, were launched on October 29, 2018. These CPUs are cost-effective versions of the newer Threadripper 2 CPUs. With a large number of Threads, these CPUs offer exceptional performance, making them suitable for various workloads.

Performance of Threadripper CPUs

When it comes to performance, more cores often contribute to better performance, especially in scenarios that require multi-threaded tasks. For instance, compiling the Linux kernel and performing Linux-related tasks benefit greatly from having a higher number of cores. Additionally, workstations based on Threadripper CPUs demonstrate impressive performance in tasks such as video compiling, Docker, and VM automation.

Differences between Linux and Windows performance

Although Threadripper CPUs display exceptional performance on Linux, there seem to be differences when it comes to Windows. Some applications exhibit a performance regression on Windows systems, which means that the performance of Threadripper CPUs is significantly worse than that of their 12-core and 16-core counterparts. This discrepancy is a software issue and not a hardware limitation. Linux, on the other HAND, handles Threadripper CPUs more efficiently, providing better performance overall.

Performance regression on Windows

The performance regression on Windows is a peculiar issue that affects certain applications. While some programs work well with Threadripper CPUs, others experience performance issues. Benchmark tests have revealed that the 32-core Threadripper 2990 WX, for example, performs slower than the 16-core Threadripper 2950 X in specific workloads. This performance regression is a software-related problem and is not Present on Linux systems. The reasons behind this regression are not entirely clear, although it is evident that Windows struggles to handle the unique CPU architecture of Threadripper CPUs.

AMD's solutions: Rison and dynamic local mode

To address the performance regression on Windows, AMD has introduced new features, namely Rison and dynamic local mode. Rison is a software designed to improve the overall performance of Threadripper CPUs. Dynamic local mode, on the other hand, enhances the performance of games such as PUBG and Battlefield, as well as certain applications. According to AMD, this feature can provide up to a 47% performance improvement when enabled.

Performance improvements with dynamic local mode

Based on our testing and other sources, dynamic local mode does show improvements in performance for specific applications. However, its impact varies depending on the software being used. While games like PUBG and Battlefield experience performance gains, other applications like Adobe Premiere and indigo may not benefit from dynamic local mode. Moreover, the performance improvement achieved with dynamic local mode should be seen as a way to recover the lost performance caused by the regression rather than an overall boost in performance.

The 24-core Threadripper 2970 WX

The 24-core Threadripper 2970 WX, launched alongside its 32-core counterpart, offers a compelling option for users who require high performance without the need for 32 cores. With a lower cost than the 32-core CPU, the 2970 WX delivers impressive performance while consuming less power. Its reduced core count allows for better heat and power delivery, resulting in a stable overclock and increased clock speeds.

The value of the 2970 WX compared to the 2990 WX

The 2970 WX provides excellent value for users who do not require the full 32-core performance of the 2990 WX. With a significant price difference and only 8 fewer cores, the 2970 WX offers a cost-effective solution for users with demanding workloads. The CPU's performance regression on Windows is still present, but the 2970 WX performs exceptionally well on Linux systems.

Gaming performance on Threadripper CPUs

When it comes to gaming, the performance differences between Intel and AMD CPUs are apparent in benchmark tests. However, in real-world scenarios, the disparity is not significant. In most cases, a high-performance 6-core CPU is sufficient for gaming purposes. While Threadripper CPUs can handle gaming tasks, it may be more cost-effective and efficient to opt for a fast 6-core CPU.

Conclusion

AMD's Threadripper CPUs have revolutionized the workstation market by offering exceptional performance at a lower cost than their competitors. With the ability to handle intensive workloads and high clock speeds, these CPUs are well-suited for various tasks. However, there are performance regressions on Windows systems that can affect certain applications. AMD has introduced solutions such as Rison and dynamic local mode to tackle these issues, but further optimization is required. Overall, Threadripper CPUs provide impressive performance on Linux systems, making them an excellent choice for users who require multi-threaded capabilities.