Unleash Your Gaming Potential with Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Table of Contents

1. Gaming Performance

   • Ashes of the Singularity Result Analysis
   • Assassin's Creed Valhalla Result Analysis
   • Counter-Strike Global Offensive Result Analysis
   • Cyberpunk 2077 Result Analysis
   • Dirt 5 Result Analysis
   • Far Cry 6 Result Analysis
   • Gears Tactics Result Analysis
   • Horizon Zero DAWN Result Analysis
   • Marvel's Guardians of the Galaxy Result Analysis
   • Metro Exodus Result Analysis
   • Rainbow Six Siege Result Analysis
   • Returnal Result Analysis
   • Shadow of the Tomb Raider Result Analysis
   • Strange Brigade Result Analysis
   • Watch Dogs Legion Result Analysis
   • World War Z Result Analysis

2. productivity Performance

   • Google Chrome Result Analysis
   • Microsoft Office Result Analysis
   • Geekbench Result Analysis
   • Crossmark Result Analysis

3. Conclusion

Gaming Performance

A. Ashes of the Singularity Result Analysis

In testing Ashes of the Singularity, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D (X3D) performed slightly better than its non-cached counterpart, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. However, both CPUs fell behind the Intel Core I9 3900K in this Game. Since Ashes of the Singularity is an older game and was not designed for CPUs with high core counts and powerful graphics, the overall gaming performance differences between the X3D and non-cached CPUs were minimal.

Pros:

• X3D performs slightly better than the non-cached CPU in Ashes of the Singularity.
• The X3D is competitive with Intel CPUs in gaming performance.

Cons:

• The X3D falls behind Intel in Ashes of the Singularity.
• Ashes of the Singularity is not optimized for high core count CPUs.

B. Assassin's Creed Valhalla Result Analysis

In Assassin's Creed Valhalla, the X3D outperformed the non-cached CPU by a small margin, indicating that the cache had a positive impact on gaming performance. The difference between the X3D and non-cached CPU was more noticeable when running the game at higher graphic settings. Additionally, the X3D performed significantly better than the Intel Core I9 3900K in this game. The cache in the X3D provided a noticeable boost in FPS and improved overall gameplay experience.

Pros:

• X3D outperforms the non-cached CPU in Assassin's Creed Valhalla.
• Significant gaming performance improvement compared to the Intel I9 3900K.

Cons:

• None.

C. Counter-Strike Global Offensive Result Analysis

In Counter-Strike Global Offensive, both the X3D and non-cached CPU showed similar performance, indicating that this game is more dependent on frequency rather than cache. The Intel Core I9 1300K performed slightly better than the X3D in this game, but the difference was not significant. Overall, there was no noticeable advantage to having a cache in this game.

Pros:

• Similar performance between X3D and non-cached CPU in Counter-Strike Global Offensive.
• Intel Core I9 1300K performs slightly better in this game.

Cons:

• No noticeable advantage to having cache in this game.

D. Cyberpunk 2077 Result Analysis

Cyberpunk 2077 showed a clear preference for AMD CPUs, with the X3D outperforming both the non-cached CPU and the Intel Core I9 3900K. The cache in the X3D provided a significant boost in FPS and overall gaming performance. The difference in performance between the X3D and non-cached CPU was more pronounced when running the game at higher graphic settings, indicating that the cache helps handle more demanding gaming scenarios.

Pros:

• X3D outperforms the non-cached CPU and the Intel Core I9 3900K in Cyberpunk 2077.
• Significant boost in FPS and overall gaming performance with cache.

Cons:

• None.

E. Dirt 5 Result Analysis

In Dirt 5, the X3D demonstrated a clear advantage over the non-cached CPU and the Intel Core I9 3900K. The cache in the X3D provided a noticeable boost in FPS and improved overall gaming experience. This game showed a strong preference for AMD CPUs, with the X3D outperforming its counterparts by a significant margin.

Pros:

• X3D outperforms the non-cached CPU and the Intel Core I9 3900K in Dirt 5.
• Significant boost in FPS and overall gaming performance with cache.

Cons:

• None.

F. Far Cry 6 Result Analysis

Far Cry 6 favored Intel CPUs, with the Intel Core I9 1300K outperforming both the X3D and non-cached CPU. The difference in performance between the X3D and non-cached CPU was minimal in this game, suggesting that cache had little impact on gaming performance. Overall, Far Cry 6 did not show a significant preference for cache or high core counts.

Pros:

• Intel Core I9 1300K outperforms X3D and non-cached CPU in Far Cry 6.
• Minimal difference in performance between X3D and non-cached CPU.

Cons:

• No noticeable advantage to having cache in this game.

G. Gears Tactics Result Analysis

In Gears Tactics, the X3D performed slightly better than the non-cached CPU and the Intel Core I9 3900K. The cache in the X3D provided a small but noticeable boost in FPS and overall gaming performance. However, the difference between the X3D and the non-cached CPU was not significant, suggesting that cache had little impact on gaming performance in this particular game.

Pros:

• X3D performs slightly better than non-cached CPU and Intel Core I9 3900K in Gears Tactics.
• Small but noticeable boost in FPS and overall gaming performance with cache.

Cons:

• Minimal difference between X3D and non-cached CPU in gaming performance.

H. Horizon Zero Dawn Result Analysis

Horizon Zero Dawn showed a clear preference for the X3D, with the X3D outperforming the non-cached CPU by a significant margin. The cache in the X3D provided a significant boost in FPS and improved overall gaming experience. This game demonstrated the advantages of cache, as the X3D surpassed both the non-cached CPU and the Intel Core I9 3900K in gaming performance.

Pros:

• X3D outperforms the non-cached CPU and the Intel Core I9 3900K in Horizon Zero Dawn.
• Significant boost in FPS and overall gaming performance with cache.

Cons:

• None.

I. Marvel's Guardians of the Galaxy Result Analysis

In Marvel's Guardians of the Galaxy, the X3D performed better than the non-cached CPU, with a noticeable boost in FPS and overall gaming performance. The X3D also outperformed the Intel Core I9 3900K in this game. The cache in the X3D provided an advantage in gaming performance, making it a desirable choice for gamers.

Pros:

• X3D outperforms the non-cached CPU and the Intel Core I9 3900K in Marvel's Guardians of the Galaxy.
• Noticeable boost in FPS and overall gaming performance with cache.

Cons:

• None.

J. Metro Exodus Result Analysis

Metro Exodus favored Intel CPUs, with the Intel Core I9 1300K outperforming both the X3D and non-cached CPU. The difference in performance between the X3D and non-cached CPU was minimal, suggesting that cache had little impact on gaming performance in this game. Overall, Metro Exodus did not show a significant preference for cache or high core counts.

Pros:

• Intel Core I9 1300K outperforms X3D and non-cached CPU in Metro Exodus.
• Minimal difference in performance between X3D and non-cached CPU.

Cons:

• No noticeable advantage to having cache in this game.

K. Rainbow Six Siege Result Analysis

In Rainbow Six Siege, the X3D performed better than the non-cached CPU and the Intel Core I9 3900K. The cache in the X3D provided a noticeable boost in FPS and overall gaming performance. This game demonstrated the advantages of cache, as the X3D surpassed both the non-cached CPU and the Intel Core I9 3900K in gaming performance.

Pros:

• X3D outperforms the non-cached CPU and the Intel Core I9 3900K in Rainbow Six Siege.
• Noticeable boost in FPS and overall gaming performance with cache.

Cons:

• None.

L. Returnal Result Analysis

In Returnal, the X3D outperformed both the non-cached CPU and the Intel Core I9 3900K. The cache in the X3D provided a significant boost in FPS and improved overall gaming experience. The difference in performance between the X3D and non-cached CPU was more pronounced when running the game at higher graphic settings, indicating that the cache helps handle more demanding gaming scenarios.

Pros:

• X3D outperforms the non-cached CPU and the Intel Core I9 3900K in Returnal.
• Significant boost in FPS and overall gaming performance with cache.

Cons:

• None.

M. Shadow of the Tomb Raider Result Analysis

Shadow of the Tomb Raider showed a significant preference for the X3D, with the X3D outperforming both the non-cached CPU and the Intel Core I9 3900K. The cache in the X3D provided a noticeable boost in FPS and improved overall gaming experience. This game demonstrated the advantages of cache, as the X3D surpassed both the non-cached CPU and the Intel Core I9 3900K in gaming performance.

Pros:

• X3D outperforms the non-cached CPU and the Intel Core I9 3900K in Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
• Significant boost in FPS and overall gaming performance with cache.

Cons:

• None.

N. Strange Brigade Result Analysis

In Strange Brigade, the Intel Core I9 1300K outperformed both the X3D and non-cached CPU. The difference in performance between the X3D and non-cached CPU was minimal, suggesting that cache had little impact on gaming performance in this game. Strange Brigade did not show a significant preference for cache or high core counts.

Pros:

• Intel Core I9 1300K outperforms X3D and non-cached CPU in Strange Brigade.
• Minimal difference in performance between X3D and non-cached CPU.

Cons:

• No noticeable advantage to having cache in this game.

O. Watch Dogs Legion Result Analysis

In Watch Dogs Legion, the X3D performed significantly better than both the non-cached CPU and the Intel Core I9 3900K. The cache in the X3D provided a large boost in FPS and improved overall gaming experience. This game showed a strong preference for AMD CPUs, with the X3D outperforming both its counterparts by a significant margin.

Pros:

• X3D outperforms the non-cached CPU and the Intel Core I9 3900K in Watch Dogs Legion.
• Significant boost in FPS and overall gaming performance with cache.

Cons:

• None.

P. World War Z Result Analysis

In World War Z, the X3D outperformed both the non-cached CPU and the Intel Core I9 3900K. The cache in the X3D provided a noticeable boost in FPS and improved overall gaming experience. World War Z showed a clear preference for AMD CPUs, with the X3D outperforming its counterparts by a significant margin.

Pros:

• X3D outperforms the non-cached CPU and the Intel Core I9 3900K in World War Z.
• Noticeable boost in FPS and overall gaming performance with cache.

Cons:

• None.

Productivity Performance

A. Google Chrome Result Analysis

In testing Google Chrome, the X3D showed similar performance to the non-cached CPU. Both CPUs performed slightly better than the Intel Core I9 1300K in this test. Overall, there was no significant advantage to having cache in Google Chrome.

Pros:

• Similar performance between X3D and non-cached CPU in Google Chrome.
• Slight improvement over Intel Core I9 1300K.

Cons:

• No significant advantage to having cache in Google Chrome.

B. Microsoft Office Result Analysis

In testing Microsoft Office, the Intel Core I9 1300K showed better performance than both the X3D and non-cached CPU. The difference in performance between the X3D and non-cached CPU was minimal. Overall, there was no significant advantage to having cache in Microsoft Office.

Pros:

• Intel Core I9 1300K outperforms X3D and non-cached CPU in Microsoft Office.
• Minimal difference between X3D and non-cached CPU in performance.

Cons:

• No significant advantage to having cache in Microsoft Office.

C. Geekbench Result Analysis

In Geekbench, the X3D performed similarly to the non-cached CPU in single-threaded performance. However, the X3D outperformed both the non-cached CPU and the Intel Core I9 1300K in multi-threaded performance. The cache in the X3D provided a slight advantage in overall productivity performance.

Pros:

• X3D outperforms the non-cached CPU and the Intel Core I9 1300K in Geekbench.
• Slight advantage in overall productivity performance with cache.

Cons:

• None.

D. Crossmark Result Analysis

In Crossmark, the Intel Core I9 1300K performed better than both the X3D and non-cached CPU. The difference in performance between the X3D and non-cached CPU was minimal. Overall, there was no significant advantage to having cache in Crossmark.

Pros:

• Intel Core I9 1300K outperforms X3D and non-cached CPU in Crossmark.
• Minimal difference in performance between X3D and non-cached CPU.

Cons:

• No significant advantage to having cache in Crossmark.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D (X3D) offers a noticeable advantage in gaming performance compared to its non-cached counterpart. The cache in the X3D provides higher FPS and improves overall gaming experience, making it an attractive option for gamers. However, the performance differences between the X3D and non-cached CPU in productivity tasks are minimal, meaning the X3D is not a significant improvement for non-gaming workloads. Overall, the X3D presents the best of both worlds for gamers who prioritize gaming performance and can benefit from the advantages of cache.