Unveiling the Ryzen ThreadRipper 1950X Benchmarks: Gaming & Rendering Performance

Unveiling the Ryzen ThreadRipper 1950X Benchmarks: Gaming & Rendering Performance

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. Rise of the Tomb Raider Benchmarks
3. Threadripper Benchmarks in 3D Mark
4. Cinebench R15 Scores
5. Blender 2.78 Benchmarks
6. Impact on Rendering and productivity
7. Comparison to Other Systems
8. Limitations of the Test System
9. Conclusion

Introduction

In this article, we will be discussing the benchmarks for the new Ryzen Threadripper 1950X processor. These benchmarks have been conducted using an Alienware 51 system and aim to provide a preview of the performance of the processor. While the benchmarks might not be extensive, they do give us an idea of what to expect from the Threadripper.

Rise of the Tomb Raider Benchmarks

One of the games used for benchmarking the Threadripper is Rise of the Tomb Raider. In DirectX 12, the performance of the processor is equivalent to that of other systems. However, in DirectX 11, there is a slight difference in performance. The Threadripper performs slightly better than the X370, but the difference is not significant. The frame rates are similar for both processors, with minor variations.

Threadripper Benchmarks in 3D Mark

The Threadripper's performance in 3D Mark benchmarks is impressive. In the Fire Strike Ultra test, the results are almost identical to those of the X299. However, in the Time Spy test, the Threadripper falls behind the X299 in terms of scores. It is important to note that the X299 has default clock speeds of 3900 MHz, while the Threadripper's scores were achieved with lower clock speeds. The difference in scores could be attributed to various factors such as RAM usage, BIOS revisions, and other considerations.

Cinebench R15 Scores

When it comes to Cinebench R15, the Threadripper outperforms the X299 by a significant margin. The multi-threaded score for the Threadripper is just under 2900 points, while the X299 scores around 2146 points. It is worth mentioning that leaked scores for the Threadripper have shown even higher results, but these scores are still impressive and showcase the processor's capabilities.

Blender 2.78 Benchmarks

In Blender 2.78, the Threadripper once again proves its superiority. The processor performs exceptionally well in rendering tasks, completing the BMW test about 40 seconds faster than the X299 platform. In the Classroom test, the Threadripper is a couple of minutes faster. While this might not seem like a significant difference, it can have a substantial impact when working on complex scenes. Faster render times enhance productivity, reduce waiting time, and make the overall workflow smoother.

Impact on Rendering and Productivity

The Threadripper's impressive performance in rendering tasks has a significant impact on productivity. Whether you are a 3D artist or a Video Editor, the faster render times and smoother workflow can save a considerable amount of time and improve overall efficiency. Waiting for renders to complete becomes less frustrating, allowing you to focus on other tasks or take a break while your system does the heavy lifting. For small businesses or individuals who rely heavily on rendering or exporting, the Threadripper can greatly enhance productivity.

Comparison to Other Systems

While the benchmarks discussed here mainly compare the Threadripper to the X299, it is important to note that there are other systems available in the market. Each system has its own strengths and weaknesses, and it is essential to consider various factors such as cost, compatibility, and specific requirements before making a decision. The Threadripper is undoubtedly a powerful processor, but it is not the only option available. Consider your specific needs and compare different systems to find the one that best suits your requirements.

Limitations of the Test System

It is essential to consider the limitations of the test system when analyzing the benchmarks. In this case, the Alienware 51 system used for benchmarking the Threadripper was not ideally configured, and it reportedly faced temperature issues. Additionally, the benchmarks conducted were limited in number, mainly focusing on a few games and rendering tasks. A more comprehensive and diverse range of benchmarks would provide a more accurate representation of the Threadripper's performance.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the benchmarks for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X processor showcase its impressive capabilities. The performance in gaming, rendering, and productivity tasks is outstanding, with the Threadripper consistently outperforming other systems. While there are limitations to the test system and the benchmarks conducted, the results indicate a promising future for the Threadripper. It is undoubtedly a powerful processor that can significantly enhance productivity and performance in various tasks.

Highlights:

• The Threadripper excels in benchmarks for gaming, rendering, and productivity tasks.
• Faster render times improve productivity and reduce waiting time.
• The Threadripper outperforms the X299 in Cinebench R15 and 3D Mark benchmarks.
• Consider the specific requirements and limitations of your system before making a decision.

FAQ

Q: Is the Threadripper only suitable for gaming?\ A: No, the Threadripper is not limited to gaming. It excels in rendering and productivity tasks as well.

Q: What are the advantages of faster render times?\ A: Faster render times improve productivity, reduce waiting time, and make the workflow smoother.

Q: Are there any limitations to the benchmarks conducted?\ A: Yes, the benchmarks conducted were limited in number and focused mainly on gaming, rendering, and productivity tasks. A more comprehensive range of benchmarks would provide a more accurate representation of the Threadripper's performance.

Resources:

• Alienware
• Ryzen Threadripper
• Rise of the Tomb Raider
• Blender