Unveiling the Supreme RX 590: Who Reigns Supreme?

Find AI Tools
No difficulty
No complicated process
Find ai tools

Unveiling the Supreme RX 590: Who Reigns Supreme?

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. testing Methodology
  3. Results for Stock Fan Curve
  4. Results at 1,700 RPMs
  5. Results at 2,300 RPMs
  6. Results at 2,800 RPMs
  7. Results at 100% Fan Speed
  8. Comparison of Max Rotation Speeds
  9. Conclusion
  10. FAQ

Introduction

In this article, we will be comparing the cooling potential of two RX5 90s graphics cards - the XFX Fat Boy Edition and the Sapphire Nitro Plus Special Edition. Both of these cards are top-of-the-line for their respective manufacturers and are designed specifically for the AMD Radeon series. If you're a Radeon fanboy and want to know which card will provide the best cooling performance, then you've come to the right place. Let's dive in and see how these cards stack up.

Testing Methodology

To determine the cooling capacity of the XFX Fat Boy and Sapphire Nitro Plus, we used the Fire Strike stress test and ran it for 20 passes. This allowed us to measure the maximum temperature each card reached during the test. Additionally, we set the rotations per minute (RPM) on both GPUs to ensure a fair comparison of cooling performance. It's important to note that we turned down the core clock rate on the XFX Fat Boy to match the Sapphire Nitro Plus, as it was initially set higher out of the box.

Results for Stock Fan Curve

Using the stock fan curves, the XFX Fat Boy reached a maximum temperature of 75 degrees Celsius, while the Sapphire Nitro Plus peaked at 74 degrees Celsius. However, due to the varying nature of stock fan curves, it was not possible to directly compare the cooling capacity of the two cards.

Results at 1,700 RPMs

At 1,700 RPMs, the XFX Fat Boy had a temperature of 81 degrees Celsius, while the Sapphire Nitro Plus maintained a cooler temperature of 73 degrees Celsius. It's worth noting that the Sapphire Nitro Plus outperformed the XFX Fat Boy in terms of temperature reduction at this RPM level.

Results at 2,300 RPMs

Increasing the fan speed to 2,300 RPMs, the XFX Fat Boy recorded a temperature of 73 degrees Celsius, whereas the Sapphire Nitro Plus achieved a lower temperature of 67 degrees Celsius. Here again, the Sapphire Nitro Plus demonstrated better cooling capabilities.

Results at 2,800 RPMs

At 2,800 RPMs, the XFX Fat Boy reached 70 degrees Celsius, while the Sapphire Nitro Plus maintained a significantly lower temperature of 59 degrees Celsius. The Sapphire Nitro Plus clearly excelled in terms of cooling efficiency at this fan speed.

Results at 100% Fan Speed

Running the fans at maximum speed, the XFX Fat Boy remained at 70 degrees Celsius, while the Sapphire Nitro Plus impressively cooled down to 46 degrees Celsius. This further solidifies the Sapphire Nitro Plus as the superior choice when it comes to cooling performance.

Comparison of Max Rotation Speeds

In terms of maximum rotation speeds, the XFX Fat Boy operated at 3,308 RPMs, while the Sapphire Nitro Plus reached a maximum of 3,170 RPMs. Although the XFX Fat Boy had a higher rotation speed, the Sapphire Nitro Plus still managed to outperform it in terms of temperature reduction.

Conclusion

Based on our testing, it is evident that the Sapphire Nitro Plus Special Edition offers superior cooling performance compared to the XFX Fat Boy Edition. With consistently lower temperatures at various fan speeds, the Sapphire Nitro Plus is the ideal choice for those seeking optimal cooling potential for their RX5 90s graphics card.

FAQ

Q: Are these cards only compatible with the AMD Radeon series? A: Yes, both the XFX Fat Boy Edition and Sapphire Nitro Plus Special Edition are specifically designed for use with the AMD Radeon series.

Q: Can I rely solely on the Fire Strike stress test to determine the maximum temperature of a graphics card? A: While the Fire Strike stress test provides valuable insights, it is recommended to monitor temperature changes over time to ensure accuracy.

Q: Do these cards require reapplying thermal paste for optimal performance? A: The cards used in our testing were in their factory condition without thermal paste reapplication. However, it is advisable to consult the manufacturer's guidelines for long-term maintenance.

Q: Will the cooling capacity of these cards vary depending on the power consumption? A: To ensure a fair comparison, it is essential to maintain similar power consumption levels when comparing the cooling capacity of different graphics cards.

Q: Can I expect consistent and reliable performance from these cards during the Fire Strike stress test? A: The Sapphire Nitro Plus demonstrated better consistency and reliability in terms of the percentage of frames passed during the Fire Strike stress test.

Resources:

Most people like

Are you spending too much time looking for ai tools?
App rating
4.9
AI Tools
100k+
Trusted Users
5000+
WHY YOU SHOULD CHOOSE TOOLIFY

TOOLIFY is the best ai tool source.

Browse More Content