Why Intel Core Ultra 7155 Falls Short: The Downside of Meteor Lake

Why Intel Core Ultra 7155 Falls Short: The Downside of Meteor Lake

Table of Contents:

1. Introduction
2. Intel Core Ultra 7155: An Overview
3. The Disappointing Performance of Intel's Meteor Lake Series
4. Comparison with Previous Intel Chips
5. Media Lake's Claimed Performance vs. Reality
6. Other Reviews and Benchmarks
7. Power Efficiency and Performance
8. Gaming Performance of Intel's Meteor Lake
9. Issues with Intel's Chipsets
10. AMD's Strong Competition
11. Conclusion

Intel Core Ultra 7155: An Overview

In recent years, Intel has been facing tough competition in the processor market, especially from AMD. The release of Intel's latest series of chips, the Meteor Lake Series, was highly anticipated. However, one particular chip from this series, the Intel Core Ultra 7155, has raised concerns among users, especially those looking for a chip to be used in a handheld device. In this article, we will delve into the reasons why the Intel Core Ultra 7155 is not suitable for a handheld and discuss the disappointing performance of Intel's Meteor Lake Series.

The Disappointing Performance of Intel's Meteor Lake Series

When it comes to handheld devices, performance and power efficiency are of utmost importance. Unfortunately, the Intel Core Ultra 7155 does not meet the expectations in these areas. Initial reviews and benchmarks have shown that this chip lags behind its competitors, particularly AMD. For instance, in Linux-based CPU benchmarks, the AMD 74u outperformed the Intel Core Ultra 7155 in around 80% of the tests. This is not a promising start for Intel.

Comparison with Previous Intel Chips

Intel's previous offerings, such as the Tiger Lake chips, have performed relatively well in terms of both low and high TDPs (Thermal Design Power). However, with the release of the Meteor Lake Series, Intel has failed to deliver a chip that can compete with its own former glory. The performance of the Intel Core Ultra 7155 falls short, even when compared to the Tiger Lake chips. This raises concerns about the direction in which Intel is heading with its processor technology.

Media Lake's Claimed Performance vs. Reality

Intel has been touting 2x performance improvements over its previous generations. However, when analyzing the performance of the Intel Core Ultra 7155 and comparing it with its closest competitor, the AMD 78 40u, it becomes evident that Intel's claims do not hold up. Even at 2x performance, the Intel Core Ultra 7155 fails to impress across various scales and benchmarks. Therefore, it is important to temper expectations and not be swayed solely by Intel's marketing promises.

Other Reviews and Benchmarks

Several other reviewers have also tested and analyzed the performance of the Intel Core Ultra 7155. One such review by Fronix, which focused on CPU benchmarks using Linux, showed that the AMD 74u consistently outperformed Intel's chip. Similarly, ETA Prime conducted tests using a Meteor Lake laptop and found relatively decent results in the Time Spy benchmark. However, when diving deeper, it became clear that Intel's chip required a significant amount of power to achieve its performance, putting it at a disadvantage in handheld devices.

Power Efficiency and Performance

In handheld devices, power efficiency is a critical factor. Notebookcheck reviewed the Intel Core Ultra 7155 and compared its power efficiency to that of the AMD 74u. The results were not favorable for Intel, with the AMD chip outperforming Intel's offering in terms of FPS per watt. This further underscores the Intel Core Ultra 7155's unsuitability for handheld devices, as it consumes a tremendous amount of power to achieve comparable performance.

Gaming Performance of Intel's Meteor Lake

Gaming performance is a crucial consideration for many users when choosing a processor. Unfortunately, the Intel Core Ultra 7155 falls short in this regard. In various gaming benchmarks, the AMD 74u consistently outperforms Intel's Meteor Lake chip. Games like The Witcher 3, GTA 5, Strange Brigade, and Far Cry 5 all showcased AMD's superior gaming performance. Even if Intel were to address these performance gaps with driver updates, it is clear that AMD's 6-month-old 74u chip still outperforms Intel's latest offering.

Issues with Intel's Chipsets

Intel has faced various issues with its chipsets in recent years. From texture bugs and VRM concerns to outright broken compatibility with certain games, Intel has struggled to keep up with the pace of game development. Unlike their competitors, Intel is not the primary focus for most game developers. This puts Intel in a disadvantaged position, and they must play catch-up while addressing these issues. The result is a chipset like the Intel Core Ultra 7155, which requires excessive power consumption to even be considered for gaming.

AMD's Strong Competition

AMD has been steadily gaining ground in the processor market, providing tough competition for Intel. Their 74u chip has proven to be a formidable opponent to Intel's Meteor Lake. With better power efficiency, superior gaming performance, and a more mature and stable driver ecosystem, AMD offers a much better option for users seeking a high-performance processor for handheld devices. Additionally, AMD's future offerings, such as the Hul Point and Stck Point, promise even greater performance gains.

Conclusion

The Intel Core Ultra 7155, from Intel's Meteor Lake Series, has failed to live up to expectations, especially for users looking for a processor for handheld devices. Its underwhelming performance, high power consumption, and various compatibility issues make it an unsuitable choice. AMD's 74u chip, despite being six months older, outperforms Intel's offering in terms of gaming performance and power efficiency. It is clear that Intel needs to improve its chipsets significantly to compete in the evolving processor market.