AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Outperforms Intel i3-8100 in New APU Battle
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Spec Comparison
- Integrated Graphics Performance
- Motherboard Options
- CPU-only Benchmarks
- Gaming Performance
- Temperature and Power Consumption
- Dedicated Graphics Card Compatibility
- Overclocking Potential
- Final Recommendation
Introduction
Today, we will compare two processors: the AMD Ryzen 3 2200G and the Intel Core i3 8100. Both CPUs are quad core processors with similar clock speeds and integrated graphics capabilities. The Ryzen 3 2200G is priced at around $100, while the Core i3 8100 can be purchased for about $115. In this article, we will determine which processor is the better choice in terms of specs, performance, and overall value.
Spec Comparison
When comparing the specifications of the Ryzen 3 2200G and the Core i3 8100, we find that they are quite similar. However, the Core i3 8100 has an advantage with its larger L3 cache size. On the other HAND, the Ryzen 3 2200G features an unlocked multiplier, which allows for potential overclocking to compensate for the smaller cache size. Additionally, the Ryzen 3 2200G theoretically supports higher frequency memory, although this did not create any issues during testing.
Integrated Graphics Performance
One of the key factors to consider when choosing between the Ryzen 3 2200G and the Core i3 8100 is the performance of their integrated graphics units. The Ryzen 3 2200G is equipped with the Radeon Vega 8 GPU, which has been praised for its superior performance compared to Intel's current integrated graphics solutions. However, it is essential to determine the extent of this performance advantage before making a decision. Let's move on to the benchmarks to find out.
Motherboard Options
In terms of motherboard options, AMD offers a wide range of choices for the Ryzen 3 2200G. Users can opt for either a B350 or the newer B450 motherboard if they want to take advantage of overclocking capabilities. Alternatively, if overclocking is not a priority, one could save even more money by selecting a budget A320 board. On the Intel side, however, the options are still limited as the only available boards for Coffee Lake CPUs are the relatively expensive Z370 models. Fortunately, rumors suggest that H370 boards will be released soon, providing a more suitable budget-friendly solution for Intel processors.
CPU-only Benchmarks
Let's start with CPU-only benchmarks to compare the raw power of the Ryzen 3 2200G and the Core i3 8100. In tasks such as rendering and video editing, both processors perform comparably, with the Core i3 8100 potentially having a slight edge, especially when using software like Vegas Pro 15. However, the Ryzen 3 2200G proves itself to be no slouch either. With a simple overclock to 3.9 GHz using the included Wraith Stealth stock cooler, it even narrowly outperforms the Core i3 8100. It is worth noting the potential for even better performance from the Core i3 8100 if it had an unlocked multiplier like the Ryzen 3 2200G.
Gaming Performance
When it comes to gaming, the Core i3 8100 takes a clear lead across all tested titles. The difference in performance is quite significant, and while it may not be noticeable to everyone, it can be a significant factor for those who prioritize gaming. The Core i3 8100 has greater gaming potential, particularly when paired with a decent graphics card. However, if you are planning to solely rely on integrated graphics, the Ryzen 3 2200G shines. Despite its weaker CPU performance, its Radeon Vega GPU makes up for it and leads to an overall victory for this chip. Another impressive aspect is the ability to overclock not only the CPU but also the Vega GPU using the included stock cooler.
Temperature and Power Consumption
When it comes to temperature and power consumption, both processors perform well. Both stock coolers run quietly, and temperatures are within acceptable limits. The Core i3 8100 has slightly lower power consumption, but it is not a deal-breaker for the Ryzen 3 2200G. Overall, these factors should not heavily influence the decision-making process.
Dedicated Graphics Card Compatibility
If you plan on using a dedicated graphics card, the decision becomes easier. In such a Scenario, the Core i3 8100 would be the better choice due to its superior gaming performance when paired with a graphics card. However, if you intend to stick with integrated graphics to save money and engage in light gaming, the Ryzen 3 2200G is the clear winner. Its Radeon Vega GPU provides a satisfactory gaming experience in the absence of a dedicated graphics card.
Overclocking Potential
One of the impressive aspects of the Ryzen 3 2200G is its overclocking potential. With the unlocked multiplier and the included stock cooler, users can easily overclock both the CPU and the GPU. This feature sets the Ryzen 3 2200G apart from the Core i3 8100, which does not offer any overclocking capabilities. If you are interested in pushing the performance of your processor further, the Ryzen 3 2200G provides a more enticing option.
Final Recommendation
In conclusion, the choice between the Ryzen 3 2200G and the Core i3 8100 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you plan to use a dedicated graphics card for gaming, the Core i3 8100 is the better option due to its superior gaming performance. However, if you are looking to save money, engage in light gaming, and take advantage of overclocking capabilities, the Ryzen 3 2200G provides a compelling choice.
Highlights
- The AMD Ryzen 3 2200G and Intel Core i3 8100 are both quad core processors with similar clock speeds and integrated graphics capabilities.
- The Core i3 8100 has an advantage with its larger L3 cache size, while the Ryzen 3 2200G features an unlocked multiplier for potential overclocking.
- The Ryzen 3 2200G's Radeon Vega 8 GPU outperforms Intel's current integrated graphics solutions.
- AMD provides more motherboard options, while Intel's options are more limited for now.
- In CPU-only benchmarks, the Ryzen 3 2200G and Core i3 8100 perform comparably, with the Core i3 potentially having a slight edge in tasks like rendering video.
- The Core i3 8100 demonstrates better gaming performance when paired with a dedicated graphics card, while the Ryzen 3 2200G excels in integrated graphics performance.
- Both processors have satisfactory temperature and power consumption levels.
- The Ryzen 3 2200G offers overclocking potential for both the CPU and GPU, while the Core i3 8100 does not support overclocking.
- The final choice depends on individual needs and budget, with the Core i3 8100 being suitable for gaming with a dedicated graphics card and the Ryzen 3 2200G being a cost-effective option for light gaming and overclocking capabilities.
FAQ
Q: Can the Ryzen 3 2200G handle gaming without a dedicated graphics card?
A: Yes, the Ryzen 3 2200G's integrated Radeon Vega 8 GPU provides satisfactory gaming performance without the need for a dedicated graphics card.
Q: Does the Core i3 8100 support overclocking?
A: No, the Core i3 8100 does not support overclocking.
Q: Which processor is better for budget gaming builds?
A: The Ryzen 3 2200G is a better choice for budget gaming builds due to its integrated graphics performance and overclocking potential.
Q: Will Intel release more budget-friendly motherboard options for Coffee Lake CPUs?
A: There are rumors of H370 boards being released soon, which will offer more affordable options for budget builders.
Q: Can the Ryzen 3 2200G outperform the Core i3 8100 in gaming when both use a dedicated graphics card?
A: No, the Core i3 8100 provides better gaming performance when paired with a dedicated graphics card.
No difficulty
WHY YOU SHOULD CHOOSE TOOLIFY
