Atom X5 Z8500 vs Atom X5 Z8300: Performance Comparison and Temperature Analysis
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Performance Comparison: Atom X5 8500 vs Atom X5 8300
- Clock Speed and GPU Differences
- Benchmark Results: Ice Storm 1.2 Score
- Temperature and Thermal Throttling
- Heat Spreader Issues with Chinese Manufacturers
- Additional Benchmarks: 3DMark 11 and Geekbench 3 Scores
- Battery Life Comparison
- Poor Optimization by Other Manufacturers
- Conclusion
Introduction
In this article, we will take a closer look at the performance differences between two popular tablets: the Atom X5 8500 and the Atom X5 8300. Both tablets come from Chinese manufacturers, but how do they stack up against each other in terms of performance? We will explore various aspects such as clock speeds, benchmark results, temperatures, and battery life. By the end of this article, you will have a better understanding of which tablet offers superior performance and overall value for your money.
Performance Comparison: Atom X5 8500 vs Atom X5 8300
The Atom X5 8500 and Atom X5 8300 are both popular choices in the tablet market, but they do have some notable differences in terms of performance. Let's dive deeper into these differences and see how they affect the overall user experience.
Clock Speed and GPU Differences
One of the key factors that contribute to the performance gap between the Atom X5 8500 and Atom X5 8300 is their clock speeds. The Atom X5 8500 has a turbo clock speed of 2.2 GHz, while the Atom X5 8300 lags behind with a clock speed of 1.8 GHz. This 400 MHz difference can significantly impact the tablets' overall processing power.
In addition to the clock speed difference, the Atom X5 8500 also has a faster GPU clock compared to the Atom X5 8300. The GPU plays a crucial role in graphics-intensive tasks such as gaming and video editing, so a higher clock speed can result in smoother performance and better visuals.
Benchmark Results: Ice Storm 1.2 Score
To get a better understanding of the performance disparity between the Atom X5 8500 and Atom X5 8300, let's take a look at the benchmark results. We ran the Ice Storm 1.2 test on both tablets to measure their graphics performance.
The Atom X5 8500 scored an impressive 25,000 in the Ice Storm 1.2 benchmark, showcasing its ability to handle demanding graphics tasks. On the other hand, the Atom X5 8300 scored 15,000, indicating a noticeable performance gap. It is important to note that these tests were conducted under ideal conditions, with the tablets not overheating or undergoing continuous benchmark loops.
Temperature and Thermal Throttling
During the benchmark tests, both tablets experienced significant temperature increases. The Atom X5 8500 reached a peak temperature of 84 degrees, while the Atom X5 8300 went up to 85 degrees. Despite the high temperatures, the Atom X5 8300 did not display any signs of thermal throttling. However, the Atom X5 8500 did detect thermal throttling, suggesting that it may reduce its performance when it gets too hot.
Heat Spreader Issues with Chinese Manufacturers
The high temperatures observed during the benchmark tests raise concerns about the heat dissipation capabilities of Chinese tablets. It is evident that improvements in the placement of heat spreaders on top of the atom chipsets are needed. Chinese manufacturers such as Teclast and Chuwi should consider implementing small copper heat sinks to enhance performance and prevent overheating issues. This change should not significantly increase costs but could greatly improve the tablets' overall performance.
Additional Benchmarks: 3DMark 11 and Geekbench 3 Scores
To gain a comprehensive understanding of the performance differences, we conducted additional benchmarks on both tablets. In the 3DMark 11 benchmark, the Atom X5 8500 outperformed the Atom X5 8300 by 90 points in the performance setting. This substantial difference emphasizes the superior processing power of the Atom X5 8500.
Similarly, in the Geekbench 3 benchmark, the Atom X5 8500 achieved a multi-core score of 2,136, while the Atom X5 8300 lagged behind with a score of 3,000. These results further highlight the advantage provided by the Atom X5 8500's 400 MHz clock speed advantage.
Battery Life Comparison
Battery life is an essential consideration when choosing a tablet. While the Atom X5 8300 boasts a reported six hours, real-world usage suggests a more realistic battery life of four and a half hours. Conversely, the Atom X5 8500 offers a battery life of around two to three hours. It is important to note that the Atom X5 8300's battery meter may display inaccuracies, affecting its reported performance.
Poor Optimization by Other Manufacturers
Chinese manufacturers like Teclast and Chuwi have a reputation for inadequately optimizing their tablets. While the Atom X5 8300 may not perform as well as it could on these tablets, we can expect other manufacturers to extract more performance from this lower-end Atom Cherry Trail chipset. Tablets like the upcoming Chuwi Hi-8 Pro and Chuwi H10 models will likely showcase better optimization and superior performance with the Atom X5 8300.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the Atom X5 8500 exhibits better performance compared to the Atom X5 8300 due to its higher clock speeds and superior GPU capabilities. Benchmark results reinforce this performance gap, with the Atom X5 8500 consistently outperforming its counterpart. However, issues with temperature and thermal throttling need to be addressed by Chinese manufacturers, who should prioritize implementing effective heat spreading techniques. Despite these concerns, the Atom X5 8500 remains a commendable choice for users seeking enhanced tablet performance.
Highlights
- The Atom X5 8500 surpasses the Atom X5 8300 in performance due to higher clock speeds and GPU capabilities.
- Benchmark results consistently show the Atom X5 8500 outperforming the Atom X5 8300 in various tests.
- Chinese manufacturers should improve heat dissipation by implementing better heat spreader techniques.
- Battery life may vary from reported values, with the Atom X5 8500 offering around two to three hours and the Atom X5 8300 providing approximately four and a half hours.
- Optimized tablets from manufacturers like Chuwi and Teclast are expected to maximize the potential performance of the Atom X5 8300.
FAQ
Q: Which tablet has better performance, the Atom X5 8500 or the Atom X5 8300?
A: The Atom X5 8500 offers superior performance compared to the Atom X5 8300. Its higher clock speeds and GPU capabilities contribute to better overall performance.
Q: Do Chinese tablets have issues with overheating?
A: Chinese tablets, such as those from Teclast and Chuwi, can experience overheating issues. Improper heat spreader placement is often the main cause of these problems.
Q: How long does the battery last on the Atom X5 8300 and Atom X5 8500 tablets?
A: The Atom X5 8300 typically provides around four and a half hours of battery life, while the Atom X5 8500 offers approximately two to three hours.
Q: Can other manufacturers optimize the Atom X5 8300 for better performance?
A: Yes, other manufacturers like Chuwi and Teclast are known for optimizing tablets to extract more performance from lower-end chipsets such as the Atom X5 8300.
No difficulty
WHY YOU SHOULD CHOOSE TOOLIFY
