Cloud Gaming Showdown: xCloud vs Stadia vs GeForce NOW vs Boosteroid

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. Speed Test Comparison
3. Quality Comparison
4. Input Options and Support
5. Performance on Different Platforms
6. Price Comparison
7. Conclusion
8. Resources

Introduction

Cloud gaming has gained significant popularity in recent years, allowing gamers to enjoy their favorite titles without the need for high-end hardware. In this article, we will delve into the world of cloud gaming and compare the performance of four popular platforms: Stadia, xCloud, Boosteroid, and GeForce Now.

Speed Test Comparison

To kick things off, let's start with a speed test comparison. We tested the loading times of Destiny 2 on each platform running through the Chrome browser on a Mac. Stadia emerged as the clear winner, with a lightning-fast load time of just under 134 seconds, followed closely by Boosteroid at 224 seconds and GeForce Now at 225 seconds. XCloud lagged behind at 314 seconds, which could be attributed to its current hardware limitations.

Quality Comparison

Moving on to the quality comparison, we noticed some notable differences between the platforms. While XCloud exhibited slightly better quality on the trees in the freeze frame, pixelation became apparent once we started moving around. GeForce Now initially experienced some stuttering issues but eventually stabilized. Stadia, on the other HAND, presented an anomaly that we will discuss further.

Input Options and Support

When it comes to input options and support, XCloud currently only supports compatible controllers and does not offer keyboard and mouse functionality. In our testing, we used a wired PS4 controller on XCloud. GeForce Now, on the other hand, does not support controllers and only allows keyboard and mouse input when playing in the browser. Stadia supports both controllers and keyboard/mouse inputs, providing greater flexibility for players.

Performance on Different Platforms

Now, let's dive into a detailed comparison of performance on different platforms. As we observed side by side comparisons of gameplay, Boosteroid stood out with its clean graphics and fluid gameplay. Although slightly darker in contrast, the visual quality appeared sharper and more refined. XCloud struggled with pixelation in heavy scenes, while Stadia and GeForce Now performed reasonably well, albeit with occasional stutters.

Price Comparison

One crucial aspect to consider is the price tag associated with each platform. Stadia offers a completely free tier with no usage limits for Destiny 2, making it an attractive option. XCloud, on the other hand, requires a subscription to the Ultimate plan, priced at £11 per month in the UK or $13 in the US. GeForce Now has a free tier limited to one hour of gameplay, with the option to purchase a Priority Membership for £10 per month. Boosteroid is also priced at £10 per month, with the option of a £50 upfront payment for the year.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the choice of the best cloud gaming platform depends on various factors such as speed, quality, input options, performance, and price. Stadia offers impressive speed and image quality, along with the advantage of being free for Destiny 2 players. Boosteroid delivers clean graphics and fluid gameplay but comes with a cost. XCloud and GeForce Now have their pros and cons, with XCloud struggling in heavy scenes and GeForce Now having limited input options. It is essential to weigh these factors and determine which platform suits your gaming preferences and budget.

Resources

• Stadia
• xCloud
• Boosteroid
• GeForce Now