Maximizing Game Performance and Visual Quality: FSR Injection Explained

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. The Concept of FSR Injectors
3. testing FSR Injectors with Two Programs
   • Lossless Scaling Tool
   • Magpie and AMD Apu Tuning Utility
4. Game 1: Sekiro Shadows Die Twice
   • Performance at 1080p
   • Performance at 720p
   • Performance with FSR Injection
5. Game 2: Batman Arkham Knight
   • Performance at 1080p
   • Performance at 634p
   • Performance with FSR Injection
6. Game 3: The Witcher 3
   • Performance at 1080p
   • Performance at 720p
   • Performance with FSR Injection
7. Game 4: Killing Floor 2
   • Performance at 1080p
   • Performance at 720p
   • Performance with FSR Injection
8. Game 5: Payday 2
   • Performance at 1080p
   • Performance at 634p
   • Performance with FSR Injection
9. Game 6: Doom 2016
   • Performance at 1080p
   • Performance at 634p
   • Performance with FSR Injection
10. Conclusion
11. Is FSR Worth It? Pros and Cons

Testing the Impact of FSR Injectors on Game Performance and Visual Quality

In today's article, we will explore the usage of FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution) injectors in games. FSR injectors are designed to enhance game performance and improve visual quality. We will be using two different programs to compare the results and determine whether there are any noticeable differences between them.

The Concept of FSR Injectors

FSR injectors, such as Magpie and the AMD Apu Tuning Utility, allow users to inject FSR into different games. These programs work similarly, but with different parameters. Magpie is a free and easy-to-use software that automatically applies FSR to a game in windowed mode by pressing Alt+F. On the other HAND, the paid program Lossless Scaling Tool offers an optimized version of FSR, specifically designed for lower-end systems, reducing the performance impact.

Testing FSR Injectors with Two Programs

To test the impact of FSR injectors, we will compare the results of Magpie and the Lossless Scaling Tool. Both programs offer FSR scaling, but with variations in performance and visual quality. By running games at their native resolution and lower resolutions with FSR injection, we can analyze the differences in performance and overall gaming experience.

Game 1: Sekiro Shadows Die Twice

First, let's examine the performance of Sekiro Shadows Die Twice at different resolutions. Running the game at 1080p with the lowest in-game graphics settings, we observed rough performance, with low frame rates and inconsistent gameplay. However, by dropping the resolution to 720p, the game became more playable, with smoother gameplay and improved frame rates.

Injecting FSR with Magpie on a lower resolution of 648p did not provide better performance but resulted in worse frame rates compared to native 720p. Testing the Lossless Scaling Tool's optimized version of FSR showed slightly improved performance, but the visual enhancement was not significant. Overall, 720p without FSR remained the best choice for this game, offering a better gaming experience.

Game 2: Batman Arkham Knight

Next, let's analyze the performance of Batman Arkham Knight. Running the game at 1080p with the lowest in-game graphics settings, we obtained a meager frame rate, making it unsuitable for high-refresh rate gaming. Dropping the resolution to 634p significantly improved performance, allowing for smooth gameplay.

When using FSR injection with Magpie, we noticed a slight improvement in visual quality with sharper edges and clearer images. However, this improvement came at the cost of reduced frame rates. Surprisingly, the Lossless Scaling Tool did not provide better performance but introduced inconsistencies in frame times.

In this case, FSR injection did not offer substantial benefits, and running the game at the native 634p resolution proved to be the better option.

Game 3: The Witcher 3

Moving on to The Witcher 3, running the game at 1080p with the lowest in-game graphics settings yielded subpar performance. The frame rates were not satisfactory for a smooth gaming experience. Dropping the resolution to 720p significantly improved the average frame rate and provided a more enjoyable gameplay experience.

Injecting FSR with Magpie slightly improved visual quality but did not justify sacrificing the improvements gained from running the game at the native 720p resolution. The Lossless Scaling Tool showed slightly better performance but did not offer a substantial improvement visually.

In The Witcher 3, running the game at native 720p remained the optimal choice, offering better performance and satisfactory visual quality.

Game 4: Killing Floor 2

Let's explore the impact of FSR injection in the lighter title Killing Floor 2. Running the game at 1080p with the lowest in-game graphics settings resulted in decent performance. However, dropping the resolution to 720p significantly improved average frame rates and allowed for high-refresh rate gaming.

Using Magpie to inject FSR enhanced the visual quality with sharper details and increased Clarity, especially on external monitors. Although there was a decrease in performance compared to native 720p, the gaming experience remained smooth and enjoyable.

Surprisingly, the Lossless Scaling Tool's optimized version of FSR provided better one percent lows and slightly lower average frame rates. Visually, the difference between Magpie and the Lossless Scaling Tool was minimal. However, running the game at native 720p without FSR still offered satisfactory performance.

Game 5: Payday 2

Next, we tested Payday 2 at different resolutions to analyze the impact of FSR injection. Running the game at 1080p with the lowest in-game graphics settings provided decent performance, although it didn't meet the requirements for high-refresh rate gaming. Dropping the resolution to 634p improved frame rates significantly, allowing for a more enjoyable experience.

Injecting FSR with Magpie slightly improved visual quality by enhancing sharpness and adding detail, especially in brighter areas. The performance suffered a noticeable hit, but the game remained playable.

Surprisingly, the Lossless Scaling Tool's optimized version of FSR yielded better one percent lows but slightly lower average frame rates. Visually, the difference between Magpie and the Lossless Scaling Tool was hard to distinguish. However, running the game at native 634p remained a viable option, providing satisfactory performance without FSR.

Game 6: Doom 2016

Finally, let's explore the impact of FSR injection in the Vulkan game Doom 2016. Running the game at 1080p with the lowest in-game graphics settings provided average performance. However, dropping the resolution to 634p significantly improved frame rates, allowing for high-refresh rate gaming.

Using Magpie to inject FSR enhanced visual quality by adding sharpness and detail. Although there was a decrease in performance, the gaming experience remained smooth and enjoyable, especially on external monitors.

The Lossless Scaling Tool's optimized version of FSR provided similar levels of performance but with slightly reduced frame rates compared to Magpie. Visually, both options offered noticeable enhancements without sacrificing the overall gaming experience.

Conclusion

After testing FSR injectors with various games, it is clear that the benefits of using FSR depend on individual games and their specific requirements. Inconsistent results were observed, with some games benefiting from FSR injection, while others suffered from reduced performance.

Magpie, being a free and easily accessible tool through the universal x86 tuning utility, is a viable option for users seeking a quick and straightforward FSR injection. However, the Lossless Scaling Tool's optimized version of FSR, despite being a paid program, did not consistently provide better results.

Whether or not FSR injectors are worth using ultimately depends on personal preference. It is recommended to test FSR on a game-by-game basis to determine if the visual enhancements outweigh the potential performance drawbacks.

Is FSR Worth It? Pros and Cons

Pros:

• Enhanced visual quality with sharper edges and clearer images
• Potential improvement in gameplay experience, especially at lower resolutions
• Easy and accessible FSR injection with Magpie through the universal x86 tuning utility

Cons:

• Inconsistent results, with varying impact on different games
• Reduction in performance, including lower average frame rates and one percent lows
• Lossless Scaling Tool's optimized version of FSR may not always provide better results

Resources:

• AMD Apu Tuning Utility
• Magpie GitHub
• Lossless Scaling Tool on Steam