Optimal Performance: Intel Core i5 2400 and Gigabyte GPU

Find AI Tools

No difficulty

No complicated process

Find ai tools

Home Hardware Optimal Performance: Intel Core i5 2400 and Gigabyte GPU

Optimal Performance: Intel Core i5 2400 and Gigabyte GPU

Introduction
PC Components
1. CPU - Intel Core i5 2400
  - Pros
  - Cons
2. GPU - Gigabyte
  - Pros
  - Cons
3. Power Supply - Lepik
  - Pros
  - Cons
4. Memory - King Style vs Crucial
  - Pros
  - Cons
5. Storage - OCZ SSD and Western Digital HDD
  - Pros
  - Cons
6. Motherboard - MSI LGA 1155
  - Pros
  - Cons
Performance testing
1. Test 1: CS:GO
  - FPS and performance
  - CPU and GPU workload
2. Test 2: Fortnite
  - FPS and performance
  - CPU and GPU workload
3. Test 3: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)
  - FPS and performance
  - CPU and GPU workload
4. Test 4: GTA 5
  - FPS and performance
  - CPU and GPU workload
5. Test 5: Far Cry
  - FPS and performance
  - CPU and GPU workload
6. Test 6: Metro Exodus
  - FPS and performance
  - CPU and GPU workload
Conclusion
Future Upgrades
Resources

PC Performance Testing: Intel Core i5 2400 and Gigabyte GPU

In today's article, we will be taking an in-depth look at the performance of a PC built using an Intel Core i5 2400 CPU and a Gigabyte graphics card. We will test the system's performance in various popular games and analyze how well these components work together. Additionally, we will discuss the pros and cons of each component and provide recommendations for future upgrades.

1. Introduction

In this article, we will be evaluating the performance of a PC built with an Intel Core i5 2400 CPU and a Gigabyte graphics card. These components were chosen for their competitive price and the potential for high-performance gaming. We will be conducting various tests to assess the system's capabilities and determine its suitability for different types of games.

2. PC Components

Let's take a closer look at each component in our PC build and discuss their specifications, pros, and cons.

2.1 CPU - Intel Core i5 2400

Pros:
- Affordable price point
- Good performance for gaming and general tasks
- Turbo boost feature for increased clock speed
Cons:
- Older generation CPU with limited upgradability options

2.2 GPU - Gigabyte

Pros:
- Affordable with good performance
- 2GB VRAM for handling HD textures
- Overclocking capability for enhanced performance
Cons:
- High power supply requirements

2.3 Power Supply - Lepik

Pros:
- 86% efficiency
- Good cable management and appearance
Cons:
- Limited wattage capacity

2.4 Memory - King Style vs Crucial

Pros:
- Good RAM capacity for gaming
Cons:
- Lower frequency for the King Style model, better suited for Windows and basic tasks

2.5 Storage - OCZ SSD and Western Digital HDD

Pros:
- SSD for faster boot times and Game loading
- Stable and reliable HDD
Cons:
- Limited capacity for the SSD

2.6 Motherboard - MSI LGA 1155

Pros:
- Compatible with a wide range of CPUs
- Support for USB 3.0 and SATA 3
Cons:
- Simple power system and lack of heat sync for MOSFETs

3. Performance Testing

In this section, we will conduct performance tests on our PC build using various popular games to evaluate its gaming capabilities. We will analyze the FPS (Frames Per Second) and CPU/GPU workload for each game.

3.1 Test 1: CS:GO

In our first test, we will assess the PC's performance in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS:GO). All settings will be set to high, and the resolution will be set to Full HD. The average FPS was recorded at 160, which is more than enough for smooth gameplay. The CPU load was around 80%, and the GPU load was at 75%.

3.2 Test 2: Fortnite

Next, we tested the PC's performance in Fortnite. All settings were set to high, and the resolution was set to Full HD. The average FPS achieved was 65, with occasional drops during intense moments. The CPU load was around 90%, and the GPU load was at 97%.

3.3 Test 3: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)

We then tested the PC's performance in PUBG. All settings were set to high, and the resolution was set to Full HD. The average FPS achieved was 54, with some fluctuations due to the game's optimization issues. The CPU load was around 90%, and the GPU load was at 98%.

3.4 Test 4: GTA 5

Moving on, we tested the PC's performance in Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5). The game utilizes CPU power, so we set all settings to high and the resolution to Full HD. The average FPS achieved was 60, with occasional drops during intensive scenes. The CPU load was consistently at 100%, while the GPU load stayed around 55%.

3.5 Test 5: Far Cry

In our next test, we evaluated the PC's performance in Far Cry. We set all settings to high and the resolution to Full HD. The average FPS achieved was 40, with some drops during action-packed moments. The GPU load reached 98% during intense scenes, while the CPU load varied between 27% and 63%.

3.6 Test 6: Metro Exodus

Lastly, we tested the PC's performance in Metro Exodus. All settings were set to high, and the resolution was set to Full HD. The average FPS achieved was 40, with some drops during heavy action scenes. Both the CPU and GPU were consistently under high load, with the CPU consistently at 100% and the GPU at its maximum capacity.

4. Conclusion

Based on the performance tests, our PC build with the Intel Core i5 2400 CPU and Gigabyte graphics card delivered satisfactory results across a range of popular games. While the FPS may not always reach the highest levels, the gameplay remained smooth and responsive. The PC components offered good value for their respective price points.

5. Future Upgrades

To further enhance the PC's performance, we recommend considering the following future upgrades:

Adding 16GB of RAM for improved multitasking and gaming performance
Upgrading the CPU to an Intel Core i7 2600k to eliminate any potential CPU bottleneck
Considering a newer graphics card for better gaming performance and more advanced features