Unveiling the Hashrates of Intel Arc A380: Mining Performance and Profitability Analysis

Table of Contents:

1. Introduction: Intel Arc A380 and its Hash Rates
2. Overview of the Intel Arc A380 GPU
3. Specifications of the Intel Arc A380 GPU
4. ASRock Challenger Edition: Pros and Cons
5. testing the Intel Arc A380 with Different Miners 5.1. SRB Minor Version 2.2.3 and ET Hash 5.2. Nanowire Miner and Prague Pal 5.3. Issues with Dynex 5.4. Ergo Mining Difficulties 5.5. Ethereum Classic Performance 5.6. Pharaoh Proof of Work and Limited Memory 5.7. SRB Miner's Support for Blake 3 Iron Fish 5.8. Caspa and its Potential 5.9. Ravencoin Mining on the Intel Arc A380
6. Calculating Profitability for Different Coins 6.1. Lithium 6.2. ETC Hash and ET Hash 6.3. Caspa 6.4. Ravencoin
7. Conclusion: The Disappointing Performance of Intel Arc A380

Intel Arc A380 and its Hash Rates

Greetings, fellow GPU enthusiasts! I am blind red from Son of a Tech, and today I am here to provide you with an update on the hash rates of the Intel Arc A380 GPU. Many of the existing videos covering the hash rates on this particular GPU are outdated, and there are numerous algorithms that still need to be tested. However, it's important to note that not all of the alleged supported algorithms actually work on the Intel Arc A380. In this article, I will guide you through the updated hash rates, test results, and other essential information related to the Intel Arc A380. But before we dive into the topic, let me take a moment to introduce myself and share a WORD about our sponsor.

Introduction: Intel Arc A380 and its Hash Rates

Hello there! It's blind red here, also known as Son of a Tech, and today I want to discuss an important update regarding the Intel Arc A380 GPU and its hash rates. This article aims to provide you with the latest and most accurate information about the hash rates of this GPU. We will cover a wide range of topics, including the specifications of the Intel Arc A380, its performance in different mining algorithms, and the profitability of mining various cryptocurrencies using this GPU. So, if you're a crypto mining enthusiast or interested in the Intel Arc A380, sit tight and let's explore this topic together.

Overview of the Intel Arc A380 GPU

The Intel Arc A380 is the latest addition to the Intel Arc GPU lineup. It is touted as their entry-level discrete GPU, offering a total board power of 75 Watts. While this GPU may not have the highest performance capabilities, it still holds potential for mining. To effectively evaluate its mining prowess, we need to delve into the memory specifications. The Intel Arc A380 features 6 gigabytes of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 186 gigabytes per Second. These specifications give us a solid foundation to analyze its mining performance.

Specifications of the Intel Arc A380 GPU

Let's take a closer look at the specifications of the Intel Arc A380 GPU. As an entry-level GPU, the A380 boasts a straightforward design. The version I have tested is the ASRock Challenger Edition. However, it's important to note that I have experienced some issues with Challenger editions in the past. This single-fan design may pose potential problems, as the fans on previous Challenger Series GPUs have been known to cause trouble. However, the updated fan design on the A380 seems promising. Although the A380 lacks a backplate, it features actively cooled memory modules. The thermal pads are thick and efficiently transfer heat to the cooler's fins. Additionally, the A380 requires a single 8-Pin PCIe power connector for extra power.

ASRock Challenger Edition: Pros and Cons

The ASRock Challenger Edition of the Intel Arc A380 comes with its own set of advantages and disadvantages. Let's take a closer look at these:

Pros:

• The updated fan design may address previous fan-related issues.
• Actively cooled memory modules provide efficient heat dissipation.
• Relatively straightforward and compact design.

Cons:

• Previous models in the Challenger Edition have had fan problems.
• There is no backplate for additional support and protection.

It's important to consider these pros and cons before making a decision on whether to choose the ASRock Challenger Edition of the Intel Arc A380.

Testing the Intel Arc A380 with Different Miners

To get a comprehensive understanding of the Intel Arc A380's mining performance, I tested it with various miners. I utilized SRB Miner version 2.2.3 for the majority of the algorithms, including ET hash. Additionally, thanks to a new release from Nanowire Miner, I was able to test Prague Pal, specifically Pharaoh proof of work, and Raven Coin. Let's now dive into the results for each algorithm and assess the A380's mining capabilities.

5.1. SRB Minor Version 2.2.3 and ET Hash

With SRB Miner version 2.2.3, the Intel Arc A380 achieved a hashrate of 432 Mega Hash per second for ET hash. It's important to note that GPU 1 represents the A380, while GPU 0 refers to the A750. Notably, the A380 lacks overclocking capabilities, and the power consumption remains consistent across all algorithms tested, at 119 Watts under 120 volts.

5.2. Nanowire Miner and Prague Pal

Testing with Nanowire Miner, I was able to evaluate the A380's performance with Prague Pal, specifically Pharaoh proof of work. Unfortunately, due to insufficient memory on the GPU, the A380 was unable to mine Pharaoh effectively. However, the A750 achieved a hashrate of 10.7 Mega Hash per second using the latest kernel for Linux. This demonstrates room for improvement in future versions.

5.3. Issues with Dynex

Regrettably, Dynex presented its own set of issues during testing. Despite the recent support, both the A380 and A750 achieved a meager hashrate of 1 Hash per second. Even worse, enabling the CPU, an 11,900K processor, resulted in a dismal 0.8 Hash per second. At present, Dynex is proving to be impractical and unviable for mining.

5.4. Ergo Mining Difficulties

During testing, mining Ergo proved challenging. The A380 encountered the dreaded "couldn't create data set for Block" error, specifically for the 964,543,636 block on GPU 1. This error signifies an issue that must be resolved externally, making it impossible to mine Ergo at the moment. However, the Discord community for SRB Miner is actively working on addressing this concern.

5.5. Ethereum Classic Performance

On a more positive note, the A380 showcased support and performance in mining Ethereum Classic. It achieved a hashrate of 14.76 Mega Hash per second at a consistent power consumption of 120 Watts. This result provides a Glimmer of hope and potential for profitable mining on the A380.

5.6. Pharaoh Proof of Work and Limited Memory

While Pharaoh proof of work couldn't be properly tested on the A380 due to memory limitations, it's essential to mention the hashrate achieved on the A750. With 10.7 Mega Hash per second, the A750 demonstrated promising potential. Further testing and optimization may be required to determine the overall profitability of mining Pharaoh with higher memory capacities.

5.7. SRB Miner's Support for Blake3 Iron Fish

Excitingly, SRB Miner now supports Blake3 Iron Fish, which is set to launch on April 20th. Testing Iron Fish with the A750 yielded astonishing results, reaching a hashrate of 3151 Mega Hash per second. While I couldn't ascertain the profitability at the time of testing, the initial performance looks promising. It is prudent to keep an eye on future developments and real-world profitability calculations for Iron Fish.

5.8. Caspa and its Potential

For Caspa, the A380 achieved a hashrate of 119 Mega Hash per second at 120 Watts. Although this result is not groundbreaking, it demonstrates the A380's capability to mine Caspa. Further exploration is necessary to determine the profitability and long-term viability of mining this particular cryptocurrency on the A380.

5.9. Ravencoin Mining on the Intel Arc A380

Lastly, let's discuss mining Ravencoin on the Intel Arc A380. With a hashrate of 19.75 Mega Hash per second and a power consumption of 120 Watts, the A380 showcases a respectable performance. It's important to note that the consistent power consumption of 120 Watts was maintained throughout all the algorithms tested. While the reasons behind this remain unclear, future investigations may shed light on this matter.

Calculating Profitability for Different Coins

Now, let's assess the profitability of mining different coins using the Intel Arc A380. We will calculate the profitability for the following coins: Lithium, ETC Hash, Caspa, and Ravencoin.

6.1. Lithium

With a hashrate of 432 Mega Hash per second and a consistent power consumption of 120 Watts, let's calculate the profitability of mining Lithium. At a price of 13 cents per kilowatt hour, the daily loss amounts to 25 cents. It's important to note that the profitability of Lithium mining is currently unviable.

6.2. ETC Hash and ET Hash

For ETC Hash, with a hashrate of 14.76 Mega Hash per second and a consistent power consumption of 120 Watts, the daily loss comes to 33 cents. However, it is worth considering other competitors such as Ethan W., Ethereum Fair, and other algorithms listed on what-to-mine. Regardless, Ethereum mining algorithms like ETC Hash may not provide substantial profitability, especially with the rise of ASICs dominating this space.

6.3. Caspa

Mining Caspa on the A380 achieves a hashrate of 119 Mega Hash per second at 120 Watts. As a result, the daily loss amounts to 30 cents. While the profitability is relatively low, further analysis and updated coin prices may warrant reconsideration.

6.4. Ravencoin

With a hashrate of 6.7 Mega Hash per second at 120 Watts, mining Ravencoin on the A380 yields a daily loss of 28 cents. Despite the negative profitability, Ravencoin's popularity and potential market fluctuations should be considered for a more accurate assessment.

Conclusion: The Disappointing Performance of Intel Arc A380

In conclusion, the Intel Arc A380 has shown mixed results in terms of mining performance. While it presents noteworthy performance in specific algorithms such as Ethereum Classic and Blake3 Iron Fish, it falls short in other areas. Test results reveal limitations with Dynex and Ergo mining, as well as Pharaoh proof of work due to memory constraints. The lack of overclocking capabilities on the A380 also limits its potential for customization and optimization. Furthermore, the consistent power consumption of 120 Watts across all tested algorithms raises questions about the GPU's efficiency.

As mining enthusiasts, it is vital to consider the profitability of mining different coins using the Intel Arc A380. Current calculations indicate unprofitability for Lithium, ETC Hash, Caspa, and Ravencoin. However, staying updated with market fluctuations, software improvements, and the introduction of new mining algorithms may alter these results in the future.

Thank you for joining me on this journey through the performance of the Intel Arc A380. If you have any suggestions, insights, or solutions to the encountered issues, please leave them in the comment section below. Remember to like, comment, subscribe, and hit the notification Bell to stay updated. I appreciate your support, and I'll see you next Tuesday! Don't forget to check out my exclusive and early content on Son of a Tech Locals at sonofatech.locals.com and the crypto mining e-Course on sonofatech.com.

Highlights:

• The Intel Arc A380 GPU offers entry-level discrete GPU performance with a total board power of 75 Watts.
• The ASRock Challenger Edition of the A380 features an updated fan design and actively cooled memory modules.
• The A380 exhibits mixed results in terms of mining performance, with noteworthy performance in Ethereum Classic and Blake3 Iron Fish algorithms.
• Dynex, Ergo, and Pharaoh mining Present challenges and limitations on the A380 due to various factors such as insufficient memory and external fix requirements.
• The A380 showcases consistent power consumption of 120 Watts across all tested algorithms, raising concerns about efficiency.
• Current calculations indicate unprofitability for mining Lithium, ETC Hash, Caspa, and Ravencoin on the A380. However, market fluctuations and software improvements may impact profitability in the future.

FAQs:

Q: What is the power consumption of the Intel Arc A380 GPU? A: The Intel Arc A380 GPU has a total board power of 75 Watts.

Q: Can the Intel Arc A380 GPU be overclocked? A: No, the A380 does not have overclocking capabilities.

Q: Is the ASRock Challenger Edition of the Intel Arc A380 recommended? A: The ASRock Challenger Edition has its advantages, such as an updated fan design and actively cooled memory modules. However, it also has drawbacks, such as potential fan problems and the lack of a backplate.

Q: Which algorithms have shown promising performance on the Intel Arc A380? A: The A380 has demonstrated notable performance in algorithms like Ethereum Classic and Blake3 Iron Fish.

Q: Are there any issues with mining Dynex on the Intel Arc A380? A: Yes, Dynex presents challenges, with both the A380 and A750 achieving low hashrates.

Q: Can Ergo mining be performed effectively on the Intel Arc A380? A: No, Ergo mining encounters difficulties on the A380 due to the "couldn't create data set for Block" error.

Q: Is Ravencoin mining profitable on the Intel Arc A380? A: Currently, Ravencoin mining on the A380 yields negative profitability. However, market fluctuations and other factors may influence profitability in the future.