Unveiling the Top Socket 939 Motherboards: Performance Evaluation and Recommendations

Unveiling the Top Socket 939 Motherboards: Performance Evaluation and Recommendations

Table of Contents:

1. Introduction
2. Motherboard Roundup: Socket 939
3. BitMotherboards
   1. BIOS Sharing and Versions
   2. Lack of Data on HW Bot
   3. Recommendations: Fatality Board
4. Abit Boards: KN8 and AN8 Series
   1. BIOS Issues and Lack of Error Recovery
   2. Support for ECC Registered DDR1 Sticks
   3. Limited Submissions and Usability
5. Albatron and Asrock Boards
   1. Irrelevance for Socket 939
   2. Weird Chipset Choices by Asrock
   3. Asus' Non-NVIDIA SLI Chipset Board
6. Asus NVIDIA Enforce Boards
   1. Bias Recovery and FSB Scores
   2. Recommendations: A8N5X and A8N32 SLI Deluxe
7. DFI Boards: LanParty and Infinity
   1. Superiority of DFI Boards
   2. Memory VRM Overclocking and Availability
   3. Recommendations: LanParty UT and Infinity Series
8. Other Manufacturers: Biostar, ECS, Epoch, Gigabyte, MSI, Sapphire
   1. Lack of Submissions and Limited Data
   2. Recommendations: Gigabyte GA-K8NF-9 and Sapphire PURE Innovation
9. Conclusion
10. Highlights
11. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Socket 939 Motherboard Roundup: Unveiling the Best Performers

In this comprehensive motherboard roundup, we will explore the highly sought-after Socket 939 motherboards. From examining BIOS sharing among BitMotherboards to delving into the overclocking potential of DFI boards, we will provide a detailed analysis of each manufacturer's offerings. By the end, you will have a clear understanding of the top-performing boards and which ones are worth your investment.

1. Introduction

The Socket 939 platform has been a favorite among tech enthusiasts for its overclocking capabilities and compatibility with powerful CPUs. As such, motherboard manufacturers have released a range of options to cater to different user needs. In this article, we will assess the performance, reliability, and unique features offered by various Socket 939 motherboards, allowing you to make an informed decision when selecting your next upgrade.

2. Motherboard Roundup: Socket 939

Socket 939 motherboards have seen their fair share of innovations and advancements over the years. In this section, we will explore the leading manufacturers and their respective offerings. From Abit's KN8 and AN8 series to Asus' Non-NVIDIA SLI Chipset Board, we will highlight the key features, advantages, and shortcomings of each motherboard. Whether you prioritize high FSB scores, error recovery, or support for ECC registered DDR1 sticks, we have the information you need to make the right choice.

3. BitMotherboards

3.1 BIOS Sharing and Versions

BitMotherboards, like the Enforce series, are known for sharing BIOS versions across their different board variations. This simplifies the firmware update process and ensures a consistent user experience. However, it poses challenges when trying to differentiate between versions that support SLI, Ultra, or 4x configurations. Despite lacking comprehensive data on HW Bot, these boards are known for their reliability and decent FSB performance. Pros: Easy BIOS updates, consistent user experience. Cons: Limited data on HW Bot, difficulty distinguishing between variations.

3.2 Lack of Data on HW Bot

BitMotherboards, particularly from Abit, suffer from a lack of substantial HW Bot data. While multiple versions of their boards exist, the limited submissions available hinder comprehensive performance evaluations. This lack of data makes it challenging to assess the full potential of Abit boards. However, their KN and AN series have been deemed usable and reliable in the absence of extensive data. Pros: Usable and reliable boards. Cons: Scarcity of performance data on HW Bot.

3.3 Recommendations: Fatality Board

If our theory on BitMotherboards sharing BIOS versions holds true, the Abit Fatality board emerges as the top contender. With limited subs available, we cannot make conclusive statements about other Abit boards' performance. However, the Fatality board distinguishes itself as a reliable and possibly top-performing option. Its compatibility with ECC registered DDR1 sticks and overall usability make it a standout choice for Socket 939 enthusiasts. Pros: Reliability, compatibility with ECC registered DDR1 sticks. Cons: Limited performance data for other Abit boards.

4. Abit Boards: KN8 and AN8 Series

4.1 BIOS Issues and Lack of Error Recovery

Abit boards, such as the KN8 and AN8 series, face criticism for their lack of error recovery. In the event of a failed POST, users are required to perform a full BIOS reset, which can be frustrating. While not as severe as Gigabyte's BIOS recovery issues, Abit's shortcomings in this area impact user experience and ease of troubleshooting. Pros: Compatibility with ECC registered DDR1 sticks. Cons: Lack of error recovery, disruptive BIOS reset process.

4.2 Support for ECC Registered DDR1 Sticks

One notable advantage of Abit boards is their support for ECC registered DDR1 sticks. This feature sets them apart from other manufacturers and can be useful for specific use cases. Our testing included a run with a registered Kimonda stick, which showcased the boards' compatibility and reliability in handling ECC memory. Pros: Support for ECC registered DDR1 sticks, compatibility with specialized memory. Cons: Limited benchmark data available for some boards.

4.3 Limited Submissions and Usability

Due to the scarcity of submissions and lackluster HW Bot data, it is challenging to provide extensive insights on the AN and KN series' performance. However, based on available information, Abit emerges as one of the few manufacturers producing reliable Socket 939 boards. While not the top performers in every aspect, their boards are considered usable and exhibit satisfactory performance, making them a viable option for enthusiasts seeking budget-friendly alternatives. Pros: Usability, satisfactory performance. Cons: Limited benchmark data for comprehensive evaluation.

5. Albatron and Asrock Boards

5.1 Irrelevance for Socket 939

Albatron and Asrock, while recognized manufacturers, have not made significant strides in the Socket 939 market. Their offerings, particularly the lack of NF4-based boards from Asrock, make them less Relevant options for users seeking high-performance motherboards for this platform. Pros: None. Cons: Limited or irrelevant product lineup for Socket 939.

5.2 Weird Chipset Choices by Asrock

Asrock's chipset choices for Socket 939, such as the 785G and GX, raise eyebrows due to their unconventional selection. Despite our research, we found no evidence of these boards performing exceptionally well. Asrock's absence from the NF4-based boards segment further diminishes their relevance in the Socket 939 motherboard landscape. Pros: None. Cons: Unconventional chipset choices, subpar performance on available boards.

5.3 Asus' Non-NVIDIA SLI Chipset Board

Asus introduces diversity with their non-NVIDIA SLI chipset board, the A8N5X. Designed as ATI Radeon Express 3200-based boards, they serve as ATI's answer to the NVIDIA SLI chipsets. While not matching the performance of top-tier options, they still offer acceptable FSB scores and notable stability. Pros: Acceptable FSB scores, stability. Cons: Limited performance compared to top-tier options.

6. Asus NVIDIA Enforce Boards

6.1 Bias Recovery and FSB Scores

Asus' NVIDIA Enforce boards, notably the A8N32 SLI Deluxe, demonstrate excellent bias recovery and high FSB scores. These boards, designed specifically for NVIDIA SLI configurations, offer stable performance and overclocking potential. While alternative options such as Abit's boards may keep up, Asus boards stand out due to their reliable bias recovery process. Pros: Bias recovery, high FSB scores. Cons: Limited availability for certain models.

6.2 Recommendations: A8N5X and A8N32 SLI Deluxe

Among Asus' NVIDIA Enforce boards, the A8N5X and A8N32 SLI Deluxe emerge as top recommendations. Their acceptable FSB scores, stability, and reliable bias recovery make them versatile choices for Socket 939 enthusiasts. While some may prefer the top-tier options from DFI, these Asus boards offer competitive performance and a more readily available alternative. Pros: Acceptable FSB scores, stability, reliable bias recovery. Cons: Limited availability for certain models.

7. DFI Boards: LanParty and Infinity

7.1 Superiority of DFI Boards

DFI boards, particularly the LanParty and Infinity series, have solidified their position as top performers in the Socket 939 market. Renowned for their overclocking potential and stability, DFI boards offer unparalleled user experience and reliability. With the ability to run ECC registered DIMMs and powerful memory VRM solutions, they stand out as the go-to choice for serious overclockers. Pros: Overclocking potential, stability, support for ECC registered DIMMs. Cons: Limited availability and higher price range.

7.2 Memory VRM Overclocking and Availability

One notable advantage of DFI boards, such as the LanParty UT and Infinity series, is their memory VRM overclocking capability. The availability of a jumper to set the memory VRM to the five-volt rail allows for higher memory voltages beyond the standard 3.3 volts. This feature, combined with a robust hardware design, sets DFI boards apart from their competitors and enables extreme overclocking potential. Pros: Memory VRM overclocking, robust hardware design. Cons: Limited availability and higher price range.

7.3 Recommendations: LanParty UT and Infinity Series

When it comes to DFI boards, the LanParty UT and Infinity series are highly recommended. These boards deliver exceptional performance, stability, and flexibility for Socket 939 enthusiasts. Their extensive overclocking potential, coupled with compatibility with ECC registered DIMMs, make them the ultimate choice for those seeking to push their system to the limits. Pros: Exceptional performance, stability, flexibility, compatibility with ECC registered DIMMs. Cons: Limited availability and higher price range.

8. Other Manufacturers: Biostar, ECS, Epoch, Gigabyte, MSI, Sapphire

8.1 Lack of Submissions and Limited Data

Certain motherboard manufacturers, such as Biostar and ECS, suffer from a lack of submissions and limited data on performance. The absence of substantial benchmark scores makes it challenging to evaluate their products fully. While Biostar can be surprising at times, these niche manufacturers' limited offerings and availability make them less relevant options for most Socket 939 enthusiasts. Pros: None. Cons: Lack of submissions, limited performance data, limited availability.

8.2 Recommendations: Gigabyte GA-K8NF-9 and Sapphire PURE Innovation

Among the less popular manufacturers, Gigabyte and Sapphire stand out as viable alternatives. The Gigabyte GA-K8NF-9, backed by a single high-scoring benchmark entry, proves to be a satisfactory option for those seeking an AGP-based board. Sapphire's PURE Innovation board presents an eye-catching aesthetic, along with decent performance. These boards excel in specific areas and can be considered if they match your specific requirements. Pros: Satisfactory performance, specialized options. Cons: Limited performance data, limited availability.

9. Conclusion

In conclusion, the Socket 939 motherboard roundup has provided detailed insights into various manufacturers and their offerings. While DFI boards, particularly the LanParty series, dominate the market in terms of overclocking potential and stability, other manufacturers like Asus and Abit provide suitable alternatives. The recommendation ultimately depends on your specific needs, budget, and availability. It is advised to thoroughly research and consider individual board capabilities and limitations before making a purchase decision.

10. Highlights

• DFI LanParty boards are the top choice for extreme overclocking and stability.
• Abit Fatality board stands out for compatibility with ECC registered DDR1 sticks and reliability.
• Asus A8N5X and A8N32 SLI Deluxe offer acceptable FSB scores and reliable bias recovery.
• Limited data and availability make it challenging to assess Biostar, ECS, Gigabyte, MSI, and Sapphire boards.
• Consider specialized options like the Gigabyte GA-K8NF-9 and Sapphire PURE Innovation for specific needs.

11. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Which motherboard brand offers the best overclocking potential for Socket 939? A: DFI's LanParty series is renowned for its exceptional overclocking potential and stability.

Q: Does Abit offer any unique features on their Socket 939 boards? A: Yes, Abit boards are known for their compatibility with ECC registered DDR1 sticks, making them suitable for specific use cases.

Q: Are there any non-NVIDIA SLI chipset boards available for Socket 939? A: Yes, Asus' A8N5X serves as an ATI Radeon Express 3200-based alternative to NVIDIA SLI chipsets.

Q: What are some recommendations for AGP-based Socket 939 boards? A: The Gigabyte GA-K8NF-9 and Sapphire PURE Innovation offer satisfactory performance and specialized options for AGP enthusiasts.

Q: Can I find comprehensive performance data for niche manufacturers like Biostar and ECS? A: Unfortunately, the limited submissions and lack of substantial benchmark scores make it challenging to evaluate their products fully.

Resources:

• HW Bot (www.hwbot.org)