Unveiling the Truth: CL30 vs CR36 DDR5 6000 Memory
Table of Contents:
- Introduction
- Difference between CL30 and CR36 of DDR5 6000
- Price comparison between CL30 and CR36
- Changing memory timings in BIOS settings
- Test results for gaming performance
- 5.1 Guardians of the Galaxy
- 5.2 Cyberpunk
- 5.3 Dying Light 2
- 5.4 Callisto Protocol
- 5.5 Red Dead Redemption
- 5.6 Watch Dogs Legion
- 5.7 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
- AMD's recommendation for DDR5 6000
- Conclusion
🖥️ Difference Between CL30 and CR36 of DDR5 6000
When it comes to choosing the right DDR5 memory for your computer, you may come across terms like CL30 and CR36. These terms refer to different latency timings of DDR5 6000 memory modules. In this article, we will explore the difference between CL30 and CR36 and determine if the price difference is justified. So, let's dive in and find out which latency timing is the better choice for your needs.
💰 Price Comparison between CL30 and CR36
Before delving into the technicalities, let's address the price difference between CL30 and CR36 DDR5 6000 memory. In Spain, we found that CL36 memory modules are priced at approximately €165, while CL30 modules are priced at around €230. This means that there is a difference of more than €60 between the two. Now, let's move on to understanding the technical aspects of these memory modules.
⚙️ Changing Memory Timings in BIOS Settings
In order to determine the performance difference between CL30 and CR36, it is necessary to adjust the memory timings in the BIOS settings. By changing the TCL value from 36 to 30, we can analyze the impact on gaming performance. It is important to note that different modules may require varying core voltages. However, for this test, we kept the core voltages at 1.35 and made the necessary changes only to the TCL value. Now, let's move on to the exciting part and see the results.
🎮 Test Results for Gaming Performance
5.1 Guardians of the Galaxy
We started our test by running Guardians of the Galaxy with both CL36 and CL30 memory modules. The Game was played at maximum settings on both 1440p and 1080p resolutions. Surprisingly, there was no major difference in frame rates between the two latency timings. In fact, the difference was only about one to three frames, which is negligible. Thus, we can conclude that there is no significant benefit in opting for the more expensive CL30 memory for this game.
5.2 Cyberpunk
Moving on to Cyberpunk, we once again tested both CL36 and CL30 memory modules at 1080p and 1440p resolutions. With ray tracing enabled, we expected to see some variation in performance. However, similar to Guardians of the Galaxy, there was no noticeable difference in frame rates between CL36 and CL30. Whether it was in terms of average frame rates or one percent lows, both latency timings performed equally well. Therefore, the expensive CL30 memory did not provide any advantage in this game.
5.3 Dying Light 2
For our next test, we chose Dying Light 2 and ran it on 1080p and 1440p resolutions with maximum settings. The results showed that there was no significant improvement in frame rates when using CL30 memory compared to CL36. However, there was a minor improvement in one percent lows at 1080p. This suggests that some older games might benefit slightly from lower latency memory.
5.4 Callisto Protocol
Moving forward, we tested Callisto Protocol with CL36 and CL30 memory modules at 1080p and 1440p resolutions with maximum settings. The benchmark results once again revealed that there was no noticeable difference between the two latency timings. Both CL36 and CL30 provided similar average frame rates and one percent lows. Therefore, there was no need to invest in more expensive memory for this game.
5.5 Red Dead Redemption
To evaluate the performance in Red Dead Redemption, we conducted tests at 1080p and 1440p resolutions with maximum settings. Surprisingly, the performance with CL30 memory was worse than with CL36 memory. Although the average frame rates remained similar, there was a noticeable improvement in one percent lows when using CL36 memory. Therefore, in some specific cases, CL36 can outperform CL30.
5.6 Watch Dogs Legion
Next on our list was Watch Dogs Legion, which we tested at 1440p and 1080p resolutions. The game was played with maximum settings to observe any performance differences between CL36 and CL30 memory modules. However, the results showed no significant variation in average frame rates or one percent lows. Once again, we can conclude that the more expensive CL30 memory does not offer any significant advantage in this game.
5.7 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
For our final test, we ran Call of Duty Modern Warfare at 1440p and 1080p resolutions using specific settings recommended for competitive gaming. The results echoed what we found in previous tests - there was no Meaningful difference in performance between CL36 and CL30 memory modules. Both latency timings delivered similar average frame rates and one percent lows. Thus, for this game as well, there was no notable benefit in choosing the expensive CL30 memory.
💡 AMD's Recommendation for DDR5 6000
According to AMD, the ideal choice to pair with every AMD Ryzen 7000 series processor is DDR5 6000 memory. This recommendation is based on cost, performance, availability, and ease of use. AMD suggests leaving the infinity Fabric overclock set to "Auto" for optimal performance. Therefore, it would be wise to choose a more affordable memory option and manually adjust the CL settings in the BIOS. In most cases, achieving lower latencies with cheaper memory modules is highly possible without any issues.
🔍 Conclusion
After careful analysis and testing, we can confidently state that there is no substantial benefit in opting for the more expensive CL30 DDR5 6000 memory over the CL36 version. The gaming performance results consistently demonstrated no significant difference between the two latency timings. Therefore, we recommend saving your money and choosing a more affordable option, as adjusting the CL settings manually can yield comparable performance. So, invest wisely and make the most of your budget.
Highlights:
- CL30 and CR36 are different latency timings of DDR5 6000 memory.
- Price comparison reveals a significant price difference between the two.
- Changing memory timings in BIOS settings is essential for comparison.
- Tests on various games consistently show no major performance difference.
- AMD recommends DDR5 6000 memory for Ryzen 7000 series processors.
- Opting for cheaper memory and manually adjusting CL settings is recommended.
FAQ:
Q: Is there a noticeable difference in gaming performance between CL30 and CR36 DDR5 6000 memory?
A: No, our tests reveal that there is no significant difference in gaming performance between the two latency timings.
Q: Why is there a price difference between CL30 and CR36 memory modules?
A: The price difference is due to the lower latency timing of CL30, which is considered a premium feature.
Q: Should I invest in more expensive CL30 memory for gaming?
A: Based on our findings, it is not necessary to invest in more expensive CL30 memory as the performance gains are minimal, if any.
Q: Can I achieve lower latencies with cheaper CL36 memory?
A: Yes, by manually adjusting the CL settings in the BIOS, you can achieve lower latencies with cheaper CL36 memory modules.
Q: What is AMD's recommendation for DDR5 6000 memory?
A: AMD recommends pairing DDR5 6000 memory with their Ryzen 7000 series processors for optimal performance and compatibility.
Q: How can I make the most of my budget when choosing DDR5 6000 memory?
A: It is advised to opt for a more affordable memory option and manually adjust CL settings to achieve comparable performance while saving money.
Resources:
No difficulty
WHY YOU SHOULD CHOOSE TOOLIFY
