Compare IIRC VS AFAnotes, what is the difference between IIRC and AFAnotes?
Ever found yourself in a chat with friends discussing a topic you vaguely remember? Introducing IIRC, short for "If I Recall Correctly." Harness the power of AI to boost your memory retention through a simple, step-by-step process.
IIRC Landing Page
AFAnotes for Slack helps engineering teams get updates relevant to their roles; saving valuable time on catchup work using AI.
AFAnotes Landing Page
Categories | Other |
IIRC Website | http://iirc.ai?utm_source=toolify |
Added Time | January 15 2024 |
IIRC Pricing | -- |
Categories | Other |
AFAnotes Website | https://afanotes.com?utm_source=toolify |
Added Time | July 05 2024 |
AFAnotes Pricing | -- |
Download the app and follow the guided step-by-step process to enhance your memory recall.
To use AFAnotes, simply connect your Slack account, customize your notifications, and start receiving prioritized updates. It's a simple integration with just a few clicks to enhance team efficiency and decision-making.
Sorry, there are no data
$0.00 USD
Get started with basic features at no cost. Includes sending up to 15 notes per month and inviting up to 5 users.
$15.50 USD
Full suite of features to enhance engineering team productivity. Includes AFAnotes AI-powered feature, integration with Slack, customer support via email, free onboarding session, unlimited history, sending unlimited notes, and single sign-on (SSO).
IIRC is the one with 3.9K monthly visits and 00:00:00 Avg.visit duration. IIRC has a Page per visit of 0.00 and a bounce rate of 0.00%.
Monthly Visits | 3.9K |
Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:00 |
Page per Visit | 0.00 |
Bounce Rate | 0.00% |
AFAnotes is the one with 0 monthly visits and 00:00:00 Avg.visit duration. AFAnotes has a Page per visit of 0.00 and a bounce rate of 0.00%.
Monthly Visits | 0 |
Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:00 |
Page per Visit | 0.00 |
Bounce Rate | 0.00% |
The top 3 countries/regions for IIRC are:Vietnam 51.75%, Australia 25.56%, Sri Lanka 22.68%
51.75% | |
![]() | 25.56% |
22.68% |
The top 2 countries/regions for AFAnotes are:Singapore 50.40%, RS 49.60%
50.40% | |
![]() | 49.60% |
The 6 main sources of traffic to IIRC are: Mail 0, Direct 0, Search 0, Social 0, Referrals 0, Display Ads 0
Mail | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
Search | 0 |
Social | 0 |
Referrals | 0 |
Display Ads | 0 |
The 6 main sources of traffic to AFAnotes are: Direct 91.67%, Social 8.33%, Mail 0.00%, Search 0.00%, Referrals 0.00%, Display Ads 0.00%
Direct | 91.67% |
Social | 8.33% |
Mail | 0.00% |
Search | 0.00% |
Referrals | 0.00% |
Display Ads | 0.00% |
IIRC might be a bit more popular than AFAnotes.As you can see, IIRC has 3.9K monthly visits, while AFAnotes has 0 monthly visits. So more people choose IIRC. So the odds are that people will recommend IIRC more on social platforms.
IIRC has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:00, while AFAnotes has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:00. Also, IIRC has a page per visit of 0.00 and a Bounce Rate of 0.00%. AFAnotes has a page per visit of 0.00 and a Bounce Rate of 0.00%.
The main users of IIRC are Vietnam, Australia, Sri Lanka, with the following distribution: 51.75%, 25.56%, 22.68%.
The main users of AFAnotes are Singapore, RS, with the following distribution: 50.40%, 49.60%.