AMD Ryzen 3700X vs Intel Core i9-9900K: A Closer Look at Gaming and Productivity Performance

AMD Ryzen 3700X vs Intel Core i9-9900K: A Closer Look at Gaming and Productivity Performance

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. Gaming Benchmarks 2.1 Tom Clancy's The Division 2 2.2 CS:GO 2.3 GTA 5 2.4 Dota 2 2.5 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2.6 Far Cry New Dawn
3. productivity Benchmarks 3.1 V-Ray 3.2 Cinebench R20 3.3 Geekbench 3.4 7-zip 3.5 Corona Renderer 3.6 Adobe Premiere Pro 3.7 DaVinci Resolve
4. Power Consumption and Temperature
5. Conclusion

🎮 Gaming Benchmarks

In this section, we will explore the gaming performance of the AMD Ryzen 3700X and Intel Core i9-9900K CPUs, both clocked at 4 GHz.

🔹 Tom Clancy's The Division 2 With both CPUs running at the same clock speed, the Intel Core i9-9900K scored slightly higher FPS compared to the Ryzen 3700X. However, the 1% lows were normal.

🔹 CS:GO Surprisingly, the Ryzen 3700X outperformed the Intel Core i9-9900K in CS:GO, scoring higher average FPS. This can be attributed to AMD optimizing the title for their CPU architecture, showcasing the IPC gains of the Zen 2.

🔹 GTA 5 In GTA 5, the Intel Core i9-9900K had a slight edge over the Ryzen 3700X, scoring higher average FPS. It seems that AMD has not optimized this game for their architecture.

🔹 Dota 2 Both CPUs performed similarly in Dota 2, with the Intel Core i9-9900K scoring slightly higher average FPS. This game showed an even match between the two CPUs.

🔹 Shadow of the Tomb Raider The Intel Core i9-9900K outperformed the Ryzen 3700X in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, scoring higher average FPS. AMD might have focused their optimization efforts on the GPU side rather than the CPU side.

🔹 Far Cry New DAWN Both CPUs performed closely in Far Cry New Dawn, with the Intel Core i9-9900K scoring slightly higher average FPS. This title seems to be using an older engine that AMD hasn't optimized for their architecture.

🖥️ Productivity Benchmarks

In this section, we will examine the productivity performance of the AMD Ryzen 3700X and Intel Core i9-9900K CPUs.

🔹 V-Ray The Ryzen 3700X showcased its superiority in productivity tasks, outperforming the Intel Core i9-9900K in the V-Ray benchmark with a five-second advantage in CPU scores.

🔹 Cinebench R20 The Ryzen 3700X dominated the multi-threaded scores in the Cinebench R20 benchmark, while the Intel Core i9-9900K had a slight advantage in single core speeds.

🔹 Geekbench In Geekbench, the Intel Core i9-9900K performed better in single-threaded scores, while the Ryzen 3700X had a higher multi-threaded score.

🔹 7-zip The Ryzen 3700X emerged victorious in both compression and decompression tasks in the 7-zip benchmark.

🔹 Corona Renderer The Corona rendering benchmark showed a close battle between the CPUs, with the Ryzen 3700X finishing just one second behind the Intel Core i9-9900K.

🔹 Adobe Premiere Pro The Ryzen 3700X proved its efficiency by rendering a 4K video file faster than the Intel Core i9-9900K in Adobe Premiere Pro.

🔹 DaVinci Resolve DaVinci Resolve also exhibited similar trends, with the Ryzen 3700X outperforming the Intel Core i9-9900K by almost a minute in this particular benchmark.

⚡ Power Consumption and Temperature During stress tests, the Intel Core i9-9900K consumed around 93 watts, while the Ryzen 3700X consumed only 75 watts. The latter also exhibited better power efficiency. Temperatures were similar for both CPUs, with the Ryzen 3700X slightly cooler.

💡 Conclusion The benchmarks reveal that while the Intel Core i9-9900K performed better in gaming, the Ryzen 3700X showcased its strength in productivity tasks. In terms of value for money, the Ryzen 3700X offers better power efficiency, includes a stock cooler, and is compatible with more affordable motherboards. The Zen 2 architecture's IPC gains highlight AMD's progress in delivering competitive CPUs. Intel now faces the challenge of improving their offerings and optimizing their CPUs for gaming performance.

Highlights:

• AMD Ryzen 3700X vs Intel Core i9-9900K gaming and productivity benchmarks
• Gaming benchmarks show Intel's advantage with higher FPS in some titles, while AMD excels in others after optimization
• Productivity benchmarks demonstrate Ryzen 3700X's performance superiority in V-Ray, Cinebench R20, 7-zip, and Adobe Premiere Pro
• Power consumption favors the Ryzen 3700X with lower wattage and better power efficiency
• Ryzen 3700X offers better value for money, backward compatibility, and a stock cooler

FAQ

Q: Which CPU performs better in gaming, the Ryzen 3700X or the Intel Core i9-9900K? A: The Intel Core i9-9900K generally outperforms the Ryzen 3700X in gaming benchmarks, but certain titles, like CS:GO, show better performance from the Ryzen CPU.

Q: Which CPU is more power-efficient, the Ryzen 3700X or the Intel Core i9-9900K? A: The Ryzen 3700X consumes less power and exhibits better power efficiency compared to the Intel Core i9-9900K.

Q: Are the Ryzen 3700X and Intel Core i9-9900K compatible with the same motherboards? A: The Ryzen 3700X is compatible with more affordable motherboards, while the Intel Core i9-9900K requires a higher-end Z390 chipset for optimum performance.

Q: Which CPU offers better value for money, the Ryzen 3700X or the Intel Core i9-9900K? A: Considering the performance, power efficiency, and included stock cooler, the Ryzen 3700X offers better value for money compared to the Intel Core i9-9900K.

Q: What are the main strengths of the Ryzen 3700X and Intel Core i9-9900K? A: The Ryzen 3700X excels in productivity tasks and offers better power efficiency, while the Intel Core i9-9900K performs better in gaming benchmarks.